|
[Sponsors] |
November 1, 2016, 23:43 |
second order scheme problem
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi every one,
I'm solving a shock tube problem using a Roe scheme (structured grids) which works fine on first order accuracy. I want to improve the solution to higher order starting from second order. I simply extrapolate the solution from the cell centers to faces using the gradients: Uface=Ucenter+Grad_U*r where r is the distance between the face and center. using this second order Taylor series I manage to improve the solution in the expansion region but the shock capturing is exactly the same as the first order solution. I use a MidMode slope limiter for the second order solution. I can's see where the problem is. any experiences? |
|
November 2, 2016, 03:48 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,897
Rep Power: 73 |
Quote:
1) to see the quantitative difference from first and second order methods you need to do a study on the convergence slope on a smooth solution 2) A limiter reduces to first order the scheme near the shock. I suggest to check first a difference test to see if for a regular solution your second order code is correct. |
||
November 2, 2016, 09:34 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Thanks a lot Filippo,
Testing on a smooth solution is a good idea. I quite agree that the limiter returns the solution to the first order near the shock but I can't see even a small improvement. A second order scheme should capture a sharper shock. |
|
November 2, 2016, 10:46 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,897
Rep Power: 73 |
First, check the convergence for a smooth solution to assess that you coded correctly the second order scheme.
Then, check the number of cells involved by the shock and check if refining the grid the shock layer width is reduced on the same number of cells. |
|
Tags |
limiter, roe scheme, second order accuracy, shock-tube |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Differencing Scheme for Advection Problem | Simon Smokes | Main CFD Forum | 2 | April 8, 2015 11:59 |
Implementation of 2nd order upwind scheme | jaason | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | February 6, 2015 18:40 |
higher order discretisation scheme | Simon Smokes | Main CFD Forum | 2 | August 23, 2014 08:19 |
2nd order upwind vs 2nd order upwind!!! | Far | Main CFD Forum | 7 | March 14, 2013 13:29 |
Discretisation scheme in CFX-1st or 2nd order? | Pete | CFX | 10 | January 12, 2005 13:48 |