|
[Sponsors] |
October 1, 2016, 17:35 |
Airfoil - Critical Reynold?
|
#1 |
Member
William
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi,
I am trying to choose the most appropriate model for my airfoil / wing. The chord length is approximately 0.165m and my maximum velocity of 15 m/s. I'm using density of 1.225 kg/m3 and dynamic viscosity of 0.000018375 kg/ms. Using Re = (rho*V*L)/(mu) = (1.225*15*0.165)/(0.000018375) gives me Reynolds number of 165.000. What is the Critical Reynolds number for Airfoils? Is there some rule of thumb for this? I'm leaning towards a Turbulent model... k-omega SST? The wing I'm using has different shape than most NACA profiles and has a blunt edge. |
|
October 3, 2016, 18:21 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Matt
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 947
Rep Power: 18 |
Are you asking what Reynolds number boundary layer transition occurs?
|
|
October 4, 2016, 19:04 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
|
You will be wasting your tme with k-omega and any other turbulence modelling at such a low reynolds number. Use x-foil or xflr5: if there is no massive separation/bubbles, then your results will be much more accurate and you will easily and quickly see if there is separation, transition, where it happens etc.
|
|
Tags |
airfoil, reynolds number, wing |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SU2 AOA optimization | 454514566@qq.com | SU2 | 9 | March 7, 2022 17:17 |
Ffd_control_point_2d | feiyi | SU2 | 4 | September 30, 2019 13:42 |
High drag for airfoil compared to XFOIL and wind tunnel data | Ry10 | SU2 | 15 | October 30, 2016 18:27 |
2D FFD Optimization | RLangtry | SU2 | 2 | August 5, 2014 10:48 |
Problem with restart solution in shape_optimization.py | robyTKD | SU2 Shape Design | 21 | May 29, 2013 10:26 |