CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Problem with complex geometry

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 2, 2016, 12:55
Default Problem with complex geometry
  #1
New Member
 
Matteo
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 10
fomalhaut is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone, I am struggling with a compressor blade that i need to mesh. I extruded the 2D blocks I had into 3D by setting a certain thickness. In the fore part of the blade I had an unstructured mesh obtained thanks to a free block.

Now I moved into 3D and I added a small triangular surface to the blade. I do not know how to associate it properly in a way that the unstructured mesh would follow the "triangles". Is it possible in some ways?

Attached some pictures. Notice how the mesh in the fore region was in 2D for the baseline blade. This section has been cut where actually there is the triangular shape, showing n evidence that it is able to follow that surface.

Matteo
Attached Images
File Type: png 1112112.PNG (82.0 KB, 12 views)
File Type: png 12122112.PNG (64.6 KB, 9 views)
File Type: png 232343.PNG (130.0 KB, 10 views)
fomalhaut is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 2, 2016, 14:03
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
DarylMusashi's Avatar
 
Holger Dietrich
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 15
DarylMusashi is on a distinguished road
Dear Matteo,

just from curiosity: What is the purpose of these triangles near the leading edge?

I have no idea which meshing software you use and I certainly never used this, but the main problem might be that these triangles do not cover the whole height of the blade (a coordinate system would be helpful). Referring to your picture 1: Are the triangles meshed correctly, when they reach completely from bottom to top?

You extruded the 2D block to a 3D block over the complete height. Maybe you need 3 different "layers" of blocks instead. I hope you understand what I mean by my picture 1_mod.
1. layer: from bottom to beginning of triangle
2. layer: from beginning to end of triangle
3. layer: from end of triangle to top

Some ideas concerning mesh quality:
1. Do you use a inflation layers in your unstructured part? This would be a good idea, otherwise the resolution and accuracy of the boundary layer flow will suffer. If the mesh quality at the leading edge ("fore part") is bad these inaccurate results will be transported downstream and affect the whole blade boundary layer. Please have a look at the first part ("Do use inflation layers"): http://www.simutechgroup.com/CFD/cfd-tips-do-dont.html

2. Maybe you want to improve the skewness of the cells in your structured part. Ideally the grid lines, which run into the blade should hit it with 90°. This is just the case for the first grid line of the structured mesh and the situation seems to get worse downstream the blade. You can improve that by adjusting the node distribution (clustering) along the blade.
Attached Images
File Type: png 1_mod.png (74.1 KB, 6 views)
File Type: png 3_mod.png (133.7 KB, 9 views)
DarylMusashi is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
geometry definition, icem, unstructured block


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem with complex eigenValues Harak OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 11 January 26, 2016 02:48
[DesignModeler] problem with import geometry from catia pavilion ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 1 November 23, 2012 11:45
[ANSYS Meshing] dealing with a complex CFD Geometry mountaineer ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 0 November 14, 2011 04:47
heat transfer in an orthotropic material and complex curved geometry zayzan FLUENT 0 October 11, 2011 11:47
problem geometry in 2-d thanos FLUENT 0 November 24, 2009 13:22


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:31.