|
[Sponsors] |
March 28, 2016, 02:04 |
Velocity field on periodic faces
|
#1 |
New Member
|
Hi,
I am trying to solve a 3D transient gas flow in a cylindrical shaped domain. The domain has two rotational periodic faces. The periodic BC was implemented in fluent and the problem was solved satisfying the convergence criteria. I have taken a section from the 3D domain and now I am looking at the velocity vectors (at a particular time) on the periodic faces as shown in the attached figure. The vectors are plotted inplane(due to 3D complex flow direction) Kindly could you clarify/help me on the following: 1. Does the magnitude of the velocity on the periodic faces would remain same ? Is it compulsory that it would be same? I mean to say does it depends on the flow field at the central region ? 2. The direction of the velocity magnitude would be same? If mathematically I want to write the BC the attached picture perioidcBC is correct ? or a negative sign would appear in the velocity term ? Kindly excuse if the question is simple, as my background is on solid mechanics and I am trying explore my problem which can solved by fluid mechanics. I would appreciate your kind help and suggestion on this. |
|
March 28, 2016, 04:30 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,896
Rep Power: 73 |
yes, all variables (scalars or vectors) must be exactly the same...
your plot shows that the periodicity is not satisfied |
|
March 28, 2016, 06:18 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
|
Quote:
Also could you suggest what could be going wrong? |
||
March 28, 2016, 07:01 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,896
Rep Power: 73 |
you must set the condition in such a way to get all the velocity components equal... if you fix only the velocity magnitude then the angle is not set properly
|
|
March 28, 2016, 07:28 |
|
#5 |
New Member
|
I have used Fluent software to solve the problem. As such I have used the rotational perioidic BC using the TUI options in Fluent. I am not sure whether it makes the components equal automatically ? What could be other way I set this condition in fluent ?
|
|
March 28, 2016, 09:35 |
|
#6 | |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,896
Rep Power: 73 |
Quote:
I am not sure how "rotational periodic" BC.s is related to standard periodicity |
||
March 29, 2016, 07:19 |
Calculations on periodic symmetris
|
#7 | |
New Member
|
Quote:
http://www.slideshare.net/khalid_nit...ambit-workshop (Please look at slide 44) https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Ans..._periodic.html According to the help manual sldies across the perioidic faces pressure drop is zero. That means P(face2)=P(face1). But no details about the velocity is mentioned. In fluent help manual i could find the following on symmetric planes: ANSYS FLUENT assumes a zero flux of all quantities across a symmetry boundary. There is no convective flux across a symmetry plane: the normal velocity component at the symmetry plane is thus zero. There is no diffusion flux across a symmetry plane: the normal gradients of all flow variables are thus zero at the symmetry plane. The symmetry boundary condition can therefore be summarized as follows:
Link: http://www.afs.enea.it/project/neptu...ug/node251.htm Can any body help me in understanding this ? Is the calculation procedure on symmetric planes applicable to rotational periodicity ? |
||
March 29, 2016, 13:11 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,896
Rep Power: 73 |
symmetric BC.s are different from periodical BC.s...
see the link below, I suppose that fluent automatically apply a rotational periodicity bc.s to the vector direction http://www.afs.enea.it/project/neptu...ug/node252.htm |
|
Tags |
cylinder domain, flow 3d, periodic bc, velocity |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
decomposePar no field transfert | Jeanp | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 3 | June 18, 2022 13:01 |
SigFpe when running ANY application in parallel | Pj. | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | April 23, 2015 15:53 |
snappyhexmesh remove blockmesh geometry | philipp1 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | December 12, 2014 11:58 |
foam-extend_3.1 decompose and pyfoam warning | shipman | OpenFOAM | 3 | July 24, 2014 09:14 |
Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 07:20 |