 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
February 19, 2016, 13:15
|
Different CFD packages
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Stuart Tait
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 10  |
Can anyone give me an short reason why CFD packages opt to use different turbulence models from each other? although similar variations i cant find reasoning for this
And also if there is any major issues with the implementation of turbulence model into CFD codes Just looking for a short answer ASAP thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
February 20, 2016, 17:47
|
|
#2 |
|
Super Moderator
Francisco Palacios
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 404
Rep Power: 15 |
It depends on the application.
Have you taken a look at SU2 (su2.stanford.edu)? Best, Francisco |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CFD Design...The CFD Future | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 20 | November 20, 2015 00:40 |
| ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 13, 2000 05:48 |
| CFD for fans & blower housings | David Carroll | Main CFD Forum | 8 | August 24, 2000 18:25 |
| ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 21, 2000 05:49 |
| Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 13, 1999 00:27 |
Linear Mode
