|
[Sponsors] |
The reason of the Sherwood number differences |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
kensuke tanaka
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
Hello.
I don't understand a explanation in a literature(Khinast, J.G.,AIChE J., 47, 2304(2001)) . He explained the reason of the Sherwood number differences in the leterature 「The difference between these values can be explained by the fact that the bubble in our computations is cylindrical and not spherical. For example, Nusselt numbers for spheres are higher than for cylinders at the same Reynolds and Prandtl numbers .」. I don't understand the reason the difference between coordinates make the results deffenent. If you kwon the reason, please tell me it. Thank you for reading my bad English. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ImmersedBoundary] Immersed Boundary Method in OpenFOAM-3.1-ext | miladrakhsha | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 106 | July 3, 2023 10:26 |
Decomposing meshes | Tobi | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 22 | February 24, 2023 09:23 |
foam-extend_3.1 decompose and pyfoam warning | shipman | OpenFOAM | 3 | July 24, 2014 08:14 |
same geometry,structured and unstructured mesh,different behaviour. | sharonyue | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | January 2, 2013 22:40 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 21:11 |