|
[Sponsors] |
February 18, 2009, 23:56 |
Turbulence modelling
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Which turbulence model is suitable for simulating high temperature(1000K) supersonic flow? I am using K-epsilon now. But it is underpredicting the axial velocity and mach number.
Morshed |
|
February 20, 2009, 12:16 |
Re: Turbulence modelling
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Which K-epsilon model are you employing ? If it is some recent model and its not performing well, try the K-omega family of models.
|
|
February 21, 2009, 14:45 |
Re: Turbulence modelling
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Also, not predicting the axial velocity can be related to a diffusive discretization scheme. If you're velocities are 'slowing' down more quickly than you would like along the axial direction, perhaps change the discretization from 2nd order to a compressive scheme (i.e. upwinding - which has its own diffusion problems).
|
|
February 22, 2009, 19:11 |
Re: Turbulence modelling
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks to both of you Harish and JK
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Turbulence postprocessing | Mohsin | FLUENT | 2 | October 3, 2016 15:18 |
Discussion: Reason of Turbulence!! | Wen Long | Main CFD Forum | 3 | May 15, 2009 10:52 |
Turbulence modelling validation : Orifice flow | Joe | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 26, 2006 17:41 |
Turbulence modelling | Panos | Siemens | 6 | July 8, 2004 03:40 |