|
[Sponsors] |
January 13, 2009, 15:20 |
validating
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi I had an analyze on an airfoil. Because I wanted to valid my CFD I first analyzed a same airfoil witch I had its experimental results. I want to know that because the model witch I have its experimental results was smaller(1/4) of the main airfoil, how can I make a relationship between the meshes of the tow airfoil? For example the size of the mesh on the airfoil, its height and so on. thanks.
|
|
January 13, 2009, 20:59 |
fourth order convective scheme in stagggered grids
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi I'm a worker direct numerical simulation of turbulence in P.R.China. These days I read Morinishi's paper " Fully conservative higher order finite difference schemes for incompressible flow, J. Comput. Phys. 143 (1998)" and found the schemes proposed in his paper are very popular . I am interested in the fourth order accurate convective scheme in a staggered grid .However, I have some problem with equation 101 of Morinishi's paper. I try to derive the discrete formula of Eq.101 and write it in my code. Unfortunately, I found kinetic energy increase with time! I checked my code for several times and it works well when the convective term is discreted by second order schemes which is also proposed in Morinishi's paper. I think may be I have derive the Eq.101 into discrete form wrongly. So could any one please give me some advice on how to derive the discrete form of the convective term in a right way
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Requesting help for validating software | HectorRedal | Main CFD Forum | 4 | September 4, 2010 11:32 |
validating | hsn | FLUENT | 3 | January 16, 2009 04:01 |
validating | hsn | CFX | 0 | January 13, 2009 02:48 |
VALIDATING COMBUSTION MODELS | ELI | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 26, 2000 02:36 |
Question concering about validating Temperature field | ghlee | Main CFD Forum | 1 | December 1, 1998 13:36 |