|
[Sponsors] |
Which code to go for free surface wave modeling.. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 11, 2008, 23:12 |
Which code to go for free surface wave modeling..
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all,
I am thinking about getting a cfd software for free surface water wave modeling. I have tried Fluent, but it has only 2nd order upwind numerical scheme for use. I would like to know other users' opinions regarding STAR-CD's performance on free surface wave modeling (interaction with structure etc.) Thanks in advance.. |
|
December 12, 2008, 04:20 |
Re: Which code to go for free surface wave modelin
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Star-cd is ok i guess, but you wouldn't want to use it for free surface modeling these days anyway, not with star-ccm+ around. That has got all the comet stuff in so it is really good.
|
|
December 12, 2008, 10:17 |
Re: Which code to go for free surface wave modelin
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks John.. I will explore more about ccm+.
|
|
December 13, 2008, 04:13 |
Re: Which code to go for free surface wave modelin
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Don't write off Fluent. It has a lot of options for modelling free surface waves, and in my experience does an excellent job of it. It is not necessarily easy to do it with Fluent, but the results tend to be very good.
|
|
December 13, 2008, 10:44 |
Re: Which code to go for free surface wave modelin
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks Charles. I am also happy with the performance of Fluent. I am just exploring more options. Actually, the cost for license is also part of my consideration. I have heard that STAR-CD is much cheaper than Fluent. What about CCM+?
|
|
December 13, 2008, 11:53 |
Re: Which code to go for free surface wave modelin
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I've used CCM+ just a little bit. I quite liked it, and locally at least it seems to be less expensive than Fluent.
|
|
December 13, 2008, 19:48 |
Re: Which code to go for free surface wave modelin
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks...
|
|
December 29, 2008, 16:42 |
Re: Which code to go for free surface wave modelin
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
An open source code that seems to be gaining momentum is called OpenFoam.
I am not sure if it would do your free surface wave modeling, but, it's free and scales nicely if you are using parallel computing/HPC. http://www.opencfd.co.uk/openfoam/fe....html#features Shelly |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Gmsh] Problem with Gmsh | nishant_hull | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 23 | August 5, 2015 03:09 |
Making Wave in free surface flow | omidiut | CFX | 4 | August 18, 2011 07:47 |
Free surface water wave profile | John N. | FLUENT | 0 | February 2, 2009 17:17 |
baffle BC in free surface modeling | natesan | Siemens | 1 | September 20, 2005 01:24 |
Code with reliable free surface capability in a rotating system | Subhasish Roy Choudhury | Main CFD Forum | 1 | September 4, 1998 19:47 |