|
[Sponsors] |
November 19, 2008, 03:30 |
Spacing od DES
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear all,
i am learning DES (Detached Eddy Simulation). In order to save the grids, it's better to use DES with large spacing in streamwise and spanwise, (Please correct me if I was wrong), to control this effect, do you always use structured grids near the surface. Well, I am using structured grids near the surface and unstructured mesh away from the surface of the obstacle, but I am not sure whether it is a good idea... Any hints? Thanks in advance. Regards, \Daniel |
|
November 23, 2008, 18:10 |
Re: Spacing od DES
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=666995&id=4&qs=Ntt%3Ddetached%252Beddy%252Bsimulation%252Bgrid%26Ntk %3Dall%26Ntx%3Dmode%2520matchall%26N%3D0%26Ns%3DHa rvestDate%257c1
Or http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20010080473 |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spanwise Length and Grid Refinement for SAS-SST, DES, and LES | Josh | CFX | 5 | October 14, 2010 20:47 |
How to use DES well? | Daniel | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 26, 2008 06:59 |
DES ( SA+LES) vs DES ( kwSST+LES) for bluff body | Phil | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 8, 2008 10:04 |
Problem with DES model | mehul | Phoenics | 0 | April 12, 2006 09:00 |
Problem with DES model | mehul | Fidelity CFD | 0 | April 12, 2006 09:00 |