|
[Sponsors] |
Substituting a porous geometry with equivalent porous zone parameters |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 23, 2015, 16:08 |
Substituting a porous geometry with equivalent porous zone parameters
|
#1 |
New Member
Robins Thomas
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello,
I am trying to replace a porous geometry (a cuboid with almost 500 holes) with equivalent porous parameters (viscous/inertial coeff.). I simulated the actual geometry and determined the 1st and 2nd order coefficients from del.p vs velocity curve. The del.p used here is the pressure difference across the porous geometry and not the actual inlet -outlet). Now I am trying to replace this geometry by a cuboid (without holes) with the calculated porous parameters. But when I try with a known pressure at the inlet, I am unable to obtain the del.p across the porous zone as I have obtained from the simulation using actual geometry. Has anyone came across similar problem ? Thanks |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FLUENT porous zone inputs | eishinsnsayshin | FLUENT | 19 | April 17, 2020 05:40 |
[Commercial meshers] Mesh conversion problem (fluent3DMeshToFoam) | Aadhavan | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 8, 2018 02:47 |
buoyantSimpleFoam + porous zone | atlan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | May 3, 2017 14:37 |
[Commercial meshers] fluentMeshToFoam multidomain mesh conversion problem | Attesz | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 12 | May 2, 2013 11:52 |
boundary condition in porous zone | lihx | FLUENT | 4 | August 28, 2010 19:36 |