|
[Sponsors] |
November 24, 1999, 15:07 |
Transition Modeling using CFX4.2
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I just want to know whether anyone has done transition modeling for separated flows using Low-Reynolds number K-W in CFX 4.2. I tried doing it but the model is not designed to handle transition problem. Some of the coefficient in the source term have to be modified ( Wilcox 1998). This can be done using USRSRC but I just want to know whether anyone has tried doing it successfully for separated confined flow problems. Thanks Athar
|
|
November 24, 1999, 16:02 |
Re: Transition Modeling using CFX4.2
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Transition modeling in separated flows... that sounds too difficult for a two-equation model. My experience is that on real-life applications two-equation models are not capable of predicting transition correctly, although they in theory could predict by-pass transition (transition caused by diffusion of turbulent energe from the free-stream into the boundary layer). I've used both the standard k-w model and the "transition optimised" k-w model trying to predict transtion on turbine blades, none worked well. Haven't used CFX though.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Missing Information in SST Transition Model Formulation | Josh | CFX | 2 | September 14, 2010 12:49 |
Code release: Flow Transition and Turbulence | Chaoqun Liu | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 26, 2008 18:15 |
Modeling Flow/Saturation/Absorption in Fibers | Gene Dougherty | Main CFD Forum | 0 | June 6, 2003 15:49 |
Hydrostatic pressure in 2-phase flow modeling (CFX4.2) | HB &DS | CFX | 0 | January 9, 2000 14:19 |
Transition modeling using K-w | Athar | CFX | 1 | November 25, 1999 02:40 |