|
[Sponsors] |
September 15, 2008, 15:12 |
FDM derived from FVM
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I have a question concerning Finite Volume Methods. Many papers, which I have seen describe finite volume techniques like finite differences. For instance: d(Q*V)/dt + d(F)/dx = 0 Once, I was told that it is possible to derive a quasi-finite difference method from the integral formulation of the conservation laws. I have found a dissertation from Cheong which describes it briefly. What I understood is: V*dQ/dt + dV/dt*Q = d(Q*V)/dt, V /= f(t) V*dQ/dt = d(Q*V)/dt But I cannot see how this will help me for the second integral and the flux F. In that diss, the result is: d(F*S)/dxi I would be really glad to see a paper or something else which describes that mathematical trick in details. Thanks for your help, in advance. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
openfoam -> fem, fvm, fdm? | tH3f0rC3 | OpenFOAM | 4 | September 3, 2015 03:51 |
FDM vs FVM vs FEM in CFD analysis | ck5285 | FLOW-3D | 1 | September 1, 2009 11:51 |
Are the quations solved in FDM or FVM ? | anon | Main CFD Forum | 0 | December 12, 2005 23:29 |
Atleast 5 general Diffrences between FVM, FEM, FDM | RAJ | FLUENT | 2 | October 7, 2005 09:25 |
comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM | kenn | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 18, 2004 19:28 |