|
[Sponsors] |
Galerkin Method Applicable for Finite-Volume? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 7, 2008, 20:02 |
Galerkin Method Applicable for Finite-Volume?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am developing a CFD model of a continuous reactor. The model is three-dimensional, cell centered, finite-volume formulation in rectangular domain using Cartesian co-ordinates. The SIMPLE method is being used with staggered grids. I would like to use the multi-grid method to solve the pressure correction equations. I have a few questions about my approach. Is it acceptable to use the Galerkin (A1=R2A2P1) method to generate course grid coefficient matrices from fine grid coefficient matrices or is it better to re-discretize the equations? Is it valid to represent one transfer matrix (R) as the transpose of another (PT) or should R and P be developed separately? Are there compatibility restrictions on R and P matrices that are developed separately? Is it acceptable to use a weighted average restriction matrix R, along with a tri-linear interpolation matrix P? Thanks you for your help Scott
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Navier stokes and the standard Galerkin method | micheldup | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 1, 2011 10:24 |
Weak statement for Galerkin Method | rugabug | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 26, 2010 20:19 |
discontinunous galerkin method | jack | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 29, 2007 15:02 |
[blockMesh] Axisymmetrical mesh | Rasmus Gjesing (Gjesing) | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 10 | April 2, 2007 15:00 |
finite volume method for CFD analysis of 2D blunt body | Aditya Vaze | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 19, 2000 14:55 |