|
[Sponsors] |
July 8, 2015, 08:10 |
Mach 4 wind tunnel 2D
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi.
I am simulating a steady 2D Mach 4 wind tunnel in order to capture the shock waves created in the measuring region. The wind tunnel has ambient conditions at the inlet and vacuum at the outlet (0.01 Pa). The inlet is a convergent-divergent nozzle and after the measuring region there is a plate whose angle I will change in order to study the behaviour of the shock waves. The problem is that I am not getting any shock wave or residuals convergence. I am using Star-CCM+. The mesh is structured (although I've tried changing to a polyhedral mesh, and also refining this). The inlet boundary condition is set as stagnation inlet (I've also tried with a mass flow inlet), with total and static ambient pressures, and total temperature of 300K. The outlet boundary is a pressure outlet, with 0.01 Pa of static pressure and a static temperature of 300K. I am using k-omega turbulence model with default settings. I have tried several different initial conditions, back pressures and inlet pressures, but I still don't get any proper result. Some other noteworthy details are: -Reference pressure is 0 Pa. -Using Coupled flow, ideal gas, steady, two-dimensional models. -Courant number 0.5 (tried several ones) -Tried also grid sequencing. -I get messages of reversed flow in the inlet and also sometimes in the outlet, and I get minimum absolute pressure corrections in X cells. Any recommendation? Best practices? I have tried so many different things. I attach some figures of the mesh, residuals and pressure and mach number scenes. Thank you in advance. |
|
July 9, 2015, 09:28 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11 |
you need consider y+ ,and the Courant number is 0.5 and i think your case is very easy divergicy, this may caused by the wrong sets of your BC
|
|
July 9, 2015, 13:26 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
Thank you. |
||
July 10, 2015, 23:20 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11 |
if the Courant numbers is 5 or 3, your case become divergency, it maybe caused by your out BC setting. if you want to capture the shockwave you need choose density-based, and use small size mesh and time step
|
|
Tags |
mach, star ccm+, superso, vacuum, wind tunnel |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[How to obtain supersonic flow inside a supersonic wind tunnel ?] | yx213 | Siemens | 1 | September 17, 2014 14:52 |
The question of Mach 3 Wind Tunnel | fuxing_hu | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 24, 2011 23:31 |
How does one vary Mach number and dynamic pressure independently in a wind tunnel | my_cfd | Main CFD Forum | 1 | August 3, 2009 14:00 |
how to consider perforated wind tunnel wall in CFD simulation | littlelz | CFX | 4 | June 11, 2009 06:51 |
Virtual Wind Tunnel in FLUENT | ND | FLUENT | 0 | April 7, 2006 08:43 |