|
[Sponsors] |
August 8, 2008, 10:48 |
understanding dual-time stepping
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi
I have just started reading about dual time stepping. I want to implement the Weiss and smith preconditioner, with dual time-stepping to maintain temporal accuracy. I have 1 fundamental doubt When the multistage algorithm for the dual time stepping is implemented, how do we know that d/d(tau)(..)=0? I understand how backward difference is used for the physical time term and how the residual is calculated etc. How many stages should there be to ensure convergence of the dual-time stepping? Thanks Srinath |
|
August 11, 2008, 12:05 |
Re: understanding dual-time stepping
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
you can decide wether d/d(tau)(..)=0 is achieved or not by either 1) monitering residual for each inner loop (that is each intermediate steady state problem) and this residual computation is same as you do for a normal implicit procedure to solve a steady state problem. 2) Or you can say d/d(tau)(..)=0 is achieved just by some experince that it may achieve after N no of iterations (this method helps you to get rid of additional residual computation). Thanks, vinayender. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TimeVaryingMappedFixedValue | irishdave | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 32 | June 16, 2021 07:55 |
time stepping schemes for compressible DNS/LES | shyamdsundar | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 15, 2010 00:15 |
Convergence moving mesh | lr103476 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 30 | November 19, 2007 15:09 |
autosave at flow time with adaptive time stepping | Ybes | FLUENT | 0 | November 3, 2007 13:32 |
local time stepping and pseudo time | phil | Fidelity CFD | 0 | February 27, 2006 17:26 |