CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

NACA0012 validation using Solidworks 2013

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 13, 2015, 20:30
Default
  #21
Member
 
Alex
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 12
H0T_S0UP is on a distinguished road
It was just an example, relax.
H0T_S0UP is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 14, 2015, 01:55
Default
  #22
New Member
 
fadli
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 11
genom92 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by MBdonCFD View Post
would you please explain 'issue unrelated to data incongruity'. or at least give an example.
-You are using one of the least accurate software packages to solve one of the most complicated problems. I have used this software before and while it has its advantages in terms of useability, it is far from roubust. To get a good solution to an airfoil problem typically requires more control that Solidworks can provide. Not to say you can't get lucky, but k-e is the only turbulence model and it is far from the best choice. Not to mention the issues with controling mesh resolution. Can you even plot your y+ value in that program? (I don't recall) If not it seems like a pointless excersice to run an analysis that is heavily dependent upon boundary layer behavior.
could you suggest other software for this problem..i'll propose to my sv to use other software..i've access to ansys15 and star ccm+ but these 2 softwares (in my view) are very complicated in every way. thats why i prefer solidworks in the first place. but since this software cant give me accurate results, i really need to change it.
genom92 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 14, 2015, 10:21
Default
  #23
Senior Member
 
Matt
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 947
Rep Power: 18
fluid23 is on a distinguished road
star-ccm+ is what I use (I also have solidworks). Star has more of a learning curve but for a simple problem like this it shouldn't be too bad. I think there are airfoil examples you can work that should get you moving.
fluid23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NACA0012 Validation Accuracy Improvement Alhasan OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 February 1, 2015 09:39
Importing Rhinoceros 3d model to SolidWorks george85 FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM 21 March 5, 2014 06:19
CFX problem in ubuntu (linux) Vigneshramaero CFX 0 July 13, 2012 11:22
CFX-Pre problem, pls help!!! cth_yao CFX 0 February 17, 2012 01:52
NACA0012 Validation Case Questions ozzythewise Main CFD Forum 3 August 3, 2010 15:39


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:22.