|
[Sponsors] |
Simulation of convective heat loss from cylinder |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 27, 2015, 07:07 |
Simulation of convective heat loss from cylinder
|
#1 |
New Member
buidu
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi all,
I am running a simulation with flow passing a finite cylinder in order to get the overall covective coefficient of the cylinder. Unstructural mesh was adopted for the calculation domain, and the elements near the cylinder is much denser than other parts. The distance of the inlet, top wall and downwall to the cylinder is 5 times of diameter, and the distance of the outlet to the cylinder is 10 times of diameter. I ran the simulation with inlet air velocity of 0.2 and 3m/s using RSM model in steady condition. Comparing with empirical euqation that calculating the Nu number, the result agree well in lower speed but much higher overestimated in case of 3m/s, around 20%. Does anyone knows how should I improve the calculation result. Thank you very much!!! Regards, Hao |
|
April 27, 2015, 12:20 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Lane Carasik
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 692
Rep Power: 15 |
Did you refine your mesh with increasing speed/Reynolds number?
|
|
April 28, 2015, 03:57 |
|
#3 |
New Member
buidu
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 12 |
||
April 28, 2015, 04:02 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Lane Carasik
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 692
Rep Power: 15 |
What wall treatment are you using?
|
|
April 28, 2015, 04:53 |
|
#5 |
New Member
buidu
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 12 |
||
April 28, 2015, 04:58 |
|
#6 |
Member
Christian
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 88
Rep Power: 13 |
I think you need to refine further downwind.
Make a cutplot of the velocity with visible mesh. |
|
April 28, 2015, 05:10 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Marion
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 13 |
Which heat-flux model are you using?
And I agree with Christian, you need to refine your mesh downstream |
|
April 28, 2015, 05:55 |
|
#8 | |
New Member
buidu
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
I think the turbulence intensity will also affect the final result. When I ran with TI in 5%, it can convergence very well. However, when I reduce the TI to 0.1%, it showed that the turbulence viscousity ratio exceed 100000. You can see the contour in attachment. The high ration zone happened in front of and behind the cylinder. How do you think I should solve this problem? Thank you. |
||
April 28, 2015, 06:02 |
|
#9 |
New Member
buidu
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 12 |
Thank you. I will do that. But do you think the turbulence intensity will also affect the results. I tried to run the case in low TI. However, the turbulence viscosity ratio reached its limitation in the zone near the cylinder. Do you think if I need to change other parameter of setting besides refine the mesh?
|
|
April 28, 2015, 08:11 |
|
#10 |
Member
Christian
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 88
Rep Power: 13 |
Check the visosity ratio after refining your mesh.
Regards |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Difficulty In Setting Boundary Conditions | Moinul Haque | CFX | 4 | November 25, 2014 18:30 |
New guy trying to solve his first simple Heat Transfer simulation. | BhaluBear | OpenFOAM | 2 | August 12, 2014 13:54 |
Writing a UDF for heat loss from a composite wall | mali28 | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 6 | January 15, 2012 10:27 |
loss calculation in simulation of turbomachines | playmaster | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 21, 2010 06:59 |
veriable heatWallFlux / heat loss | Shoonya | OpenFOAM | 1 | July 16, 2010 19:10 |