|
[Sponsors] |
March 31, 2015, 23:15 |
alternatives to moving mesh
|
#1 |
Member
Thangam Natarajan
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Perth
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 16 |
If one has to simulate oscillating plate/solid wall ( sinusoidal function of time) in a domain (a simple piston movement in 'y' direction), the obvious way would be scenario 1. For brevity, assume there is no topological changes involved.
Scenario 1: To use dynamic mesh and move the mesh points via the prescribed equation. Scenario 2: The fluid near wall takes up a zero velocity (assuming no slip). Now, With this in mind, using an oscillating velocity boundary condition in 'U' at the plate/solid wall (working out the velocity of the fluid for the plate's displacement amplitude) as the fluid should obey the no slip condition and produce the flow features similar to a moving mesh ? Will the result of scenario 2 be different to scenario 1? Is scenario 2 the right way to represent a near wall fluid with no slip? what happens to 'k' and 'pressure' in scenario 2? Thanks Thangam. |
|
Tags |
dynamic mesh, moving mesh., no-slip, wall boundary condition |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow | vishwa | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 24 | June 27, 2016 09:54 |
How to let the mesh motion solver just solve a small region near a moving boundary? | zhajingjing | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | April 28, 2016 05:15 |
snappyhexmesh remove blockmesh geometry | philipp1 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | December 12, 2014 11:58 |
3D Hybrid Mesh Errors | DarrenC | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 11 | August 5, 2013 07:42 |
[snappyHexMesh] external flow with snappyHexMesh | chelvistero | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | January 15, 2010 20:43 |