|
[Sponsors] |
March 2, 2008, 13:19 |
high cfl number and discretization scheme
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I have a general question concerning the accuracy of unsteady RANS calculations when using a high CFL number. Is it worth to use any kind of central differencing scheme with large CFL numbers? Visually I imagine that using cds the flow field is 'accurately' calculated at one time step, but the flow gets 'bad' resolved for the next time step!? This should actually matter especially for flows with no enforced direction!? Or do I understood this completely wrong? Greetings! Fab |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFL Condition | Matt Umbel | Main CFD Forum | 19 | June 30, 2020 09:20 |
Calculation of the Governing Equations | Mihail | CFX | 7 | September 7, 2014 07:27 |
When to use upwind or central differencing schemes? | quarkz | Main CFD Forum | 6 | August 19, 2011 04:24 |
how to calculate CFL number in 3D convection-diffusion channel flow | dryhill | Main CFD Forum | 0 | June 24, 2009 04:33 |
Low-Re and second order discretization | Ralf | Siemens | 1 | May 11, 2006 11:16 |