|
[Sponsors] |
January 20, 2008, 20:42 |
RMS values too high!
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
When i plot my velocity profiles i get almost perfect results for my LES simulation. However, my rms values are very high compared to DNS results even though the shape of my graphs is almost similar to DNS graphs. Any idea what is going on? Thanks in advance.
Usman |
|
January 22, 2008, 05:35 |
Re: RMS values too high!
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
you did not explain about your problem..
|
|
January 22, 2008, 07:03 |
Re: RMS values too high!
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Pankaj
I am simulating a flow on duct with four ribs inside. I have run my case using periodic boundary conditions, everything went fine. When i start collecting results at the locations specified in paper. My mean velocity profiles look very similar to DNS and experimental profiles, however when i got my rms values they were a bit too high compared to DNS values. I am thinking it might be because my rms values have not yet reached steady state. This is because when i plotted my rms values as function of time they were still changing. Any idea what can be cause of high rms values. Thanks Usman |
|
January 22, 2008, 12:21 |
Re: RMS values too high!
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Which paper you are matching?
|
|
January 22, 2008, 14:12 |
Re: RMS values too high!
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"LES and RANS for turbulent flow over arrays of wall-mounted obstacles" by Zhengtong Xie. Ian P. Castro
Usman |
|
January 22, 2008, 14:22 |
Re: RMS values too high!
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
One more thing Pankaj, if you look at the paper can you tell how would you normalise mean velocity and rms values. In other words what would be your u* value. Thanks
Usman |
|
January 22, 2008, 16:49 |
Re: RMS values too high!
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
i have already sent you a personal mail to your mail id. please read it. so, we can discuss more on this topic. anyway.... 1. are you running dimensional code? 2.then how you are tackling the mass flow rate or desired Re, for a given pressure gradient.?
|
|
January 23, 2008, 07:24 |
Re: RMS values too high!
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi pankaj
I e-mailed you back providing you details regarding my problem. Usman |
|
January 23, 2008, 18:12 |
Re: RMS values too high!
|
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> Any idea what is going on?
These are LES simulations? If so, somewhat counter intuitively, one can often get too large and too anistropic turbulence when using coarse grids. Try increasing the resolution and seeing what happens. Of course, without being familiar with the details of what you are doing, I would suggest a pretty low confidence level in this sort of diagnosis. |
|
January 24, 2008, 08:02 |
Re: RMS values too high!
|
#10 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Andy
I am using same grid resolution as they have in paper so it should not be a problem. My supervisor thinks i have to run it out longer. So i am letting it run for now. Thanks for reply. Usman |
|
February 7, 2008, 00:21 |
Re: RMS values too high!
|
#11 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is this an inflow/outflow problem. If so, how do you prescribe velocity at the inlet. Is there turbulence at inflow?
|
|
February 7, 2008, 07:24 |
Re: RMS values too high!
|
#12 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I used periodic boundary conditions for inlet and outlet to develop turbulence.
Usman |
|
February 7, 2008, 12:43 |
Re: RMS values too high!
|
#13 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Well, hope that running your simulation for long time would bring down the rms values! Keep us posted.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how to understand high resolution scheme and high order scheme | iilw1314 | Main CFD Forum | 7 | April 12, 2022 13:29 |
Y-Plus values at aerofoil leading edge and trailing edge at high incidence | Engr07 | Main CFD Forum | 4 | June 29, 2012 11:42 |
high LHTC values in Coolant jacket analysis | rcm | STAR-CCM+ | 7 | January 15, 2011 01:21 |
Correct values of drag but high values of lift. | aamer | Main CFD Forum | 16 | December 16, 2010 05:44 |
max node values exceed max element values in contour plot | jason_t | FLUENT | 0 | August 19, 2009 12:32 |