|
[Sponsors] |
January 8, 2008, 09:26 |
About CFL number !
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The CFL number is function of three parameters, it's found for controller that the scheme is stable. The choice of the CFL infect the space time. In case of Roe scheme, the scheme is stable for 0 < CFL <=1. So far I think that all fine. In some meshes there will be no stable for value lower than 1, but they still need to be small, and even if it was in this interval was not necessarily stability
Could you explain it ! thanks |
|
January 19, 2008, 23:29 |
Re: About CFL number !
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Are you using FVM code or finite difference code. Low courant number is not a stability requirement for FVM codes.
Usman |
|
January 21, 2008, 10:09 |
Re: About CFL number !
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
That's not correct. A low CFL number is not a stability requirement for implicit schemes, but an explicit FV scheme will still be CFL-limited.
|
|
January 23, 2008, 19:16 |
Re: About CFL number !
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
ag is right! Sorry about that. For some reason i mixed up FV with implicit scheme.
Usman |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow | vishwa | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 24 | June 27, 2016 09:54 |
[snappyHexMesh] external flow with snappyHexMesh | chelvistero | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | January 15, 2010 20:43 |
CFL number specification sonic/supersonic flow | gr | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 16, 2009 12:14 |
high cfl number and discretization scheme | Fab | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 2, 2008 13:19 |
About Courant (CFL) number | Jason | Main CFD Forum | 2 | March 17, 2003 12:11 |