CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Error: Divergence detected in AMG solver: temperature ?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 7, 2014, 22:10
Default Error: Divergence detected in AMG solver: temperature ?
  #1
New Member
 
Sankeerth
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 11
sankeerth2292 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

Please help me out! Iam doing a CFD modelling of Vortex tube in Fluent. Iam a beginner to CFD.


Regards,
Sankeerth
sankeerth2292 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 8, 2014, 09:58
Default hi
  #2
New Member
 
rahul kumar
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 12
R4RAHUL is on a distinguished road
what type of help you need? what you want to know about cfd?
R4RAHUL is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 11, 2014, 03:45
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Sankeerth
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 11
sankeerth2292 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by R4RAHUL View Post
what type of help you need? what you want to know about cfd?
Iam doing a project in Vortex Tube. I want to model the flow. To do that how should the mesh be?(any advice on this would really be good) And how do i mesh manually in Ansys Mesh. Iam using Workbench Interface for solving in Fluent.

Any help in this regard is much appreciated.

Thank you in advance
sankeerth2292 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 11, 2014, 04:06
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Sankeerth
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 11
sankeerth2292 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by sankeerth2292 View Post
Iam doing a project in Vortex Tube. I want to model the flow. To do that how should the mesh be?(any advice on this would really be good) And how do i mesh manually in Ansys Mesh. Iam using Workbench Interface for solving in Fluent.

Any help in this regard is much appreciated.

Thank you in advance
While trying to model the flow, I obtained Divergence in AMG Solver: Pressure Correction. My BCs were inlet pressure at 9atm or 911925 Pascal(absolute pressure) and inlet Temp=300 K
and At outlets i have considered that gauge pressures are zero.
sankeerth2292 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 11, 2014, 05:48
Default hi
  #5
New Member
 
rahul kumar
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 12
R4RAHUL is on a distinguished road
just decrease your under relaxation factor and then try again
R4RAHUL is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 13, 2015, 11:27
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Sankeerth
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 11
sankeerth2292 is on a distinguished road
Iam not able to generate the temperature difference no matter how many times i try. I tried simulating in Solidworks and Fluent , was completely unsuccessful in my attempt to obtain results.
Can anyone please what might be the reason for this?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg VT_2.JPG (25.5 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg VT_1.JPG (25.0 KB, 4 views)
sankeerth2292 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 13, 2015, 12:29
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Matt
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 947
Rep Power: 18
fluid23 is on a distinguished road
You probably have a mesh issue if you are a beginner. That can cause all kinds of issues. You really aren't giving us enough information to help you. What does your mesh look like? What kind of turbulence model are you using? What are your initial conditions? These are all things that you should try to communicate when you ask for help.
fluid23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 13, 2015, 14:30
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Sankeerth
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 11
sankeerth2292 is on a distinguished road
Dimensions of the model:
Inlet Dia: 4mm
Vortex Tube Dia= 2.5mm
Cold tube dia = 0.84mm
Length of Vortex tube= 125mm

Model: Standard k-e Turbuence model
Solver type: Steady, Pressure based
Fluid: Air(Ideal gas)

Boundary Conditions:
Inlet Pressure= 601325 Pa
Outlet Pressure Cold = 101325 Pa
Outlet Pressure Hot = 101325 Pa
Operating Conditions Pressure= 0 Pa

Turbulent Parameters:
Turbulent Intensity= 10%
Hydraulic Diameters at each Cross-section have been given as input in

Hybrid Initialization has been done

Meshing Details

Sizing: On proximity and curvature
Initially assembly meshing was not at all used but i found very poor quality of elements were being formed, then i tried with assembly meshing there was good increase in quality

Assembly Meshing(Cutcell) has been done to improve element quality

Attached is the mesh image

can initialization of the model influence the convergence ability?
How do we modify the mesh if it's not proper(I mean should we go by trial and error only)?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg VT_mesh.jpg (39.2 KB, 8 views)
sankeerth2292 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 13, 2015, 14:43
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Matt
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 947
Rep Power: 18
fluid23 is on a distinguished road
Is this your whole domain? Can you show a cut through the middle that shows what the mesh looks like inside? Unfortunately, it is tough to tell much from looking at the outside surfaces.
fluid23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 13, 2015, 14:50
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Matt
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 947
Rep Power: 18
fluid23 is on a distinguished road
There are several ways to check if your mesh is adequate. The most important being y+, but also quality, skewness, volume change and aspect ratio. Ask someone in the Fluent forum how to proceed with that if you are unsure. I use different software so I can't really help you on that. This isn't really the right forum for such a discussion anyway.

http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/fluent/
fluid23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 13, 2015, 22:37
Default
  #11
New Member
 
Sankeerth
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 11
sankeerth2292 is on a distinguished road
Here are some mesh images that i have taken .
May I know what software are you using and what is meant by "y+"?

mesh1.jpg

mesh2.jpg

mesh3.jpg

mesh4.jpg

mesh5.jpg
sankeerth2292 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 13, 2015, 22:40
Default
  #12
New Member
 
Sankeerth
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 11
sankeerth2292 is on a distinguished road
Other Mesh images are attached here

Is this mesh fine? If not how do you suggest i mesh the part?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mesh6.jpg (62.1 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg mesh7.jpg (66.9 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg mesh8.jpg (64.0 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg mesh9.jpg (64.4 KB, 4 views)
sankeerth2292 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 16, 2015, 08:03
Default
  #13
Senior Member
 
Matt
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 947
Rep Power: 18
fluid23 is on a distinguished road
Is this gray thig a fluid or a solid? I am confused. You should be meshing the fluid around your object, not the object itself. Unless you are solving for heat transfer, then you will need the solids too.

As for wall Y+, check the wiki on this site for details. It is a fundamental aspect of CFD and if you are ignoring it you are in for all kinds of trouble. Basically it is a measure of how appropriate your boundary layer mesh is for the local flow conditions. There is more to it than that, but you should really figure that out for yourself.

I use star-ccm+.
fluid23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 16, 2015, 08:27
Default
  #14
New Member
 
Sankeerth
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 11
sankeerth2292 is on a distinguished road
The Gray thing is the fluid volume extracted from the solid model(solid model has been made in solidworks).

The meshed & extracted fluid volume has been shown in the pictures
sankeerth2292 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 16, 2015, 08:35
Default
  #15
Senior Member
 
Matt
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 947
Rep Power: 18
fluid23 is on a distinguished road
In that case it looks like you need to add bounday layer refinement. I would bet that is why you are seeing divergence. Your cells near the wall are too big for the near wall calculations (i.e. your y+ is too big). I am not sure what options your software has available so I would HIGHLY recommend going and getting help in the Fluent forum (link posted above).
fluid23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Error: Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction wanna88 FLUENT 19 April 6, 2016 02:57
Error: Divergence detected in AMG solver: x-momentum/ epsilon/ temperature bubuchacha FLUENT 6 February 26, 2013 03:30
Divergence detected AMG solver error Rub Nawaz Khalid FLUENT 2 August 14, 2010 11:01
" Divergence detected in AMG solver: temperature" Suman FLUENT 4 September 11, 2009 09:31
Error: divergence detected in AMG solver Yash FLUENT 2 December 2, 2008 10:12


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:57.