Convection Diffusion 1-D Matrix Problem

balrog · November 3, 2014, 11:15

Hi

I am new to this forum and very much new to CFD, I have used commercial codes in the past but have never really delved into the theory until now. I have been set at university a lab to convert a 1-D Convection Diffusion problem into matrix form within Excel. I am using finite difference schemes to approximate the derivatives to the problem.

I am using a central difference scheme to approximate the diffusion term and a first order upwind approximation for the convection term.

The governing equation is

$U\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}-v\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x^2} = 0$

Boundary conditions - f=0 at x=0 and f=1 at x=L

My problem is, I have created the matrices of these terms and completed a combined coefficient matrix and my task is to comment on accuracy, stability when varying the Peclet number. Beyond that I also have to modify the convection scheme from the first order upwind scheme to a second-order central difference scheme and compare.

So

First Order Upwind Scheme
$\Delta x\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} \approx f_{i}-f_{i-1}$

Modified to

Second Order Central Difference
$\Delta x\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} \approx 0.5(f_{+1}-f_{i-1}$

These are constructed into a 11x11 matrix following the discretised form of the equation. This is just [Pe(Delta(x))*AConv+Adiff]*F = B

The matrices bar the convection matrix are pretty irrelevant to my question so with relation to the convection upwind scheme equation used above it is easy and is just 1's down the central diagonal apart from the corners for boundary conditions and the diagonal below is just -1's. Everything else is 0.

I'm just wondering for the conversion of this matrix to a second-order central difference, how should the matrix look. I know it will be 0's instead of 1's down the central diagonal but the 0.5?

I am getting very erratic results for different Peclet numbers with the second order central difference implementation I have tried so I'm thinking I have entered the matrix in wrong.

Sorry if this is a little confusing, I can attempt to share my spread sheet if required.

sbaffini · November 3, 2014, 14:34

Could you share your solution for different Peclet numbers? Say, from 0.5 to 4 with steps 0.5?

How do you expect the solutions to behave at the different Peclet numbers and why?

November 3, 2014, 11:15	Convection Diffusion 1-D Matrix Problem	#1
balrog New Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Posts: 1 Rep Power: 0	Hi I am new to this forum and very much new to CFD, I have used commercial codes in the past but have never really delved into the theory until now. I have been set at university a lab to convert a 1-D Convection Diffusion problem into matrix form within Excel. I am using finite difference schemes to approximate the derivatives to the problem. I am using a central difference scheme to approximate the diffusion term and a first order upwind approximation for the convection term. The governing equation is $U\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}-v\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x^2} = 0$ Boundary conditions - f=0 at x=0 and f=1 at x=L My problem is, I have created the matrices of these terms and completed a combined coefficient matrix and my task is to comment on accuracy, stability when varying the Peclet number. Beyond that I also have to modify the convection scheme from the first order upwind scheme to a second-order central difference scheme and compare. So First Order Upwind Scheme $\Delta x\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} \approx f_{i}-f_{i-1}$ Modified to Second Order Central Difference $\Delta x\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} \approx 0.5(f_{+1}-f_{i-1}$ These are constructed into a 11x11 matrix following the discretised form of the equation. This is just [Pe(Delta(x))AConv+Adiff]F = B The matrices bar the convection matrix are pretty irrelevant to my question so with relation to the convection upwind scheme equation used above it is easy and is just 1's down the central diagonal apart from the corners for boundary conditions and the diagonal below is just -1's. Everything else is 0. I'm just wondering for the conversion of this matrix to a second-order central difference, how should the matrix look. I know it will be 0's instead of 1's down the central diagonal but the 0.5? I am getting very erratic results for different Peclet numbers with the second order central difference implementation I have tried so I'm thinking I have entered the matrix in wrong. Sorry if this is a little confusing, I can attempt to share my spread sheet if required.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
problem with diffusion	katya	FLUENT	1	March 29, 2016 17:07
How to solve natural convection problem in fluent?	samantasubho	FLUENT	7	April 17, 2014 03:07
Is there a template for this problem (convection)?	massive_turbulence	OpenFOAM Programming & Development	1	May 25, 2013 04:55
Heat sink with forced convection problem	Prasad	FLUENT	5	December 20, 2011 02:10
Natural Convection Problem - Helium	marzoa	STAR-CCM+	0	April 18, 2011 15:12

November 3, 2014, 14:34		#2
sbaffini Senior Member Paolo Lampitella Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Italy Posts: 2,192 Blog Entries: 29 Rep Power: 39	Could you share your solution for different Peclet numbers? Say, from 0.5 to 4 with steps 0.5? How do you expect the solutions to behave at the different Peclet numbers and why?