|
[Sponsors] |
October 20, 2007, 07:58 |
two phase flow with surface tension
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have a quesiton on how to define the difficulty for simulation of two phase flows with interface. If the flow is dominated by viscocity, it is simple If it is dominated by inertial, the interface shape changes a lot, it is not difficult the flow dominated by surface tension is the most difficult.
Then the problem is how to define the difficulty. Once there is a parameter named Ohnesorge number Oh= mu/sqrt(D rho sigma), but in there parameter, the diameter is beside the surface tension. As we know according to the Lapalace dp=sigma/r, small r means higher surface tension force. Does anyone has a better idea? |
|
October 20, 2007, 08:13 |
Re: two phase flow with surface tension
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Someone uses the level set method to distinguish the interface. Then the heviside function can be incorporated to determine density and viscosity across the interface.
rho=rho1*H+(1-H)*rho2 vis=vis1*H+(1-H)*vis2 where rho1 is density in phase 1 and rho2 in phase 2. H is a heaviside function ranging from 0 to 1. Please refer to the immersed interface method, the level set method and so on. |
|
October 21, 2007, 01:29 |
Re: two phase flow with surface tension
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You misunderstand my questions. My questions is to know how difficult the problem is, instead of how to represent the density.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Surface tension driven flow | Saeedeh Mohebbinia | FLUENT | 3 | October 11, 2019 13:12 |
gas-liquid 2 phase flow in microchannels using VoF | LyngHoo | FLUENT | 1 | November 13, 2012 20:01 |
Problem with capturing water-spreading for free surface flow | devesh.baghel | OpenFOAM | 2 | December 10, 2009 02:21 |
how 2 freeze 1 phase flow field & start lagrangian | KK | CFX | 5 | February 14, 2008 17:48 |
CFX4.3 -build analysis form | Chie Min | CFX | 5 | July 13, 2001 00:19 |