|
[Sponsors] |
October 16, 2007, 18:37 |
SIMPLE, SIMPLER or PISO?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello
How do you choose between the algorithms SIMPLE, SIMPLER or PISO? Are there any guideline somewhere? Can someone draft a recommendation? Thanks in advance G.L. ps: I noriced you can search for CFD users on http://www.linkedin.com |
|
October 18, 2007, 05:29 |
Re: SIMPLE, SIMPLER or PISO?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
PISO is the more robust from the three algorithms. But it is a little bit more complex to implement. But in some cases the convergence is 20-50% faster.
If I were you, I would choose PISO. It worth the extra trouble of incorporating the extra terms. SIMPLER on the other hand is a little bit faster than SIMPLE and it is extremely easy to implement. Just change a coefficient of the SIMPLE algorithm. hope it helps |
|
October 19, 2007, 00:44 |
Re: SIMPLE, SIMPLER or PISO?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
For compressible NS equation,which one are used?
|
|
October 22, 2007, 05:59 |
Re: SIMPLE, SIMPLER or PISO?
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am sorry for a mistake in my previous message. In SIMPLEC there is only a change in a coefficient, while SIMPLER is a bit more complicated.
All can be used for compressible flow. |
|
October 24, 2007, 00:27 |
Re: SIMPLE, SIMPLER or PISO?
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Are there any introduction on solving compressible flow by SIMPLE or other three algorithms? I know how to implement simple algorithm for incompressible flow,but add a energy equation for compressible flow. How to deal with the addition equation?
thanks |
|
October 24, 2007, 05:50 |
Re: SIMPLE, SIMPLER or PISO?
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You just compute density with the ideal gas law or any other law. And ofcourse the incoming flow rate does not equal the outcoming flow rate as in incompressible flows.
|
|
October 24, 2007, 10:09 |
Re: SIMPLE, SIMPLER or PISO?
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Well, not quite. You do need to also solve the energy equation (typically the enthalpy equation is used.)
|
|
October 24, 2007, 12:20 |
Re: SIMPLE, SIMPLER or PISO?
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear George,
Careful on: "And ofcourse the incoming flow rate does not equal the outcoming flow rate as in incompressible flows." Mass must be conserved. Therefore, for steady state calculations, the incoming mass flow must be identical to the outgoing mass flow. Int_over_allboundaries (density * velocity) dot dA = zero Opaque |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SIMPLE (or SIMPLER) fortran code | Francesco Di Maio | Main CFD Forum | 6 | January 18, 2017 05:59 |
SIMPLE OR SIMPLER algorithm | Sergio Costa | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 29, 2007 07:44 |
SIMPLE and PISO | Aditya | Main CFD Forum | 5 | April 1, 2006 19:52 |
SIMPLE and SIMPLER code | TAW | Main CFD Forum | 10 | August 25, 2005 07:09 |
PISO vs. SIMPLE | benedikt flurl | Main CFD Forum | 2 | April 14, 2005 07:54 |