|
[Sponsors] |
September 26, 2007, 15:08 |
How to model hypersonic flow
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, I am trying to model hypersonic flow around a blunt body. I could go upto Mach number 3.5 after which the solution diverges. Any thoughts please? I am using the following Operating pressure 101325 Pa
If I make the operating pressure to 0 I get floating point error. I am relatively new to CFD and FLUENT. Thanks, Subramani |
|
September 27, 2007, 08:59 |
Re: How to model hypersonic flow
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
what is your boundary condition?. How much cfl you used?. try by reducing CFL. Are you running implicit or explicit ?. Is it viscous or inviscid?
Velan |
|
September 27, 2007, 09:14 |
Re: How to model hypersonic flow
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Some numerical schemes (e.g Roe) produce carbuncle = numerical instability. Playing with the mesh could solve the problem (align mesh with shock, increase ratio length over width where width is the size in direction of incoming flow)
|
|
September 27, 2007, 13:32 |
Re: How to model hypersonic flow
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Boundary conditions Pressure farfield Cfl 5 I have to try reducing it, yes. I am doing implicit and inviscid.
Have you guys done high Mach number flows? What about the operating pressure? Can I go ahead with 101325 Pa? Is there any tutorial available for high Mach number flows? Thanks a lot for the response guys. |
|
September 28, 2007, 06:32 |
Re: How to model hypersonic flow
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Subramani,
I know very well FLUENT. It's inable to simulate the flow with important Mach number. Use FASTRAN, or other CFD code which is specially developped for hypersoni (Mach>5). Best, MD. |
|
September 28, 2007, 08:39 |
Re: How to model hypersonic flow
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Margarita, Thanks for your response. When I increase the Mach number from lets say 0.55 to 2.5, I have to change the operating pressure and temperature right? Please let me know. I found a few papers where they have used FLUENT for hypersonic flow and that's why I started.
Thanks, Subramani |
|
September 28, 2007, 12:25 |
Re: How to model hypersonic flow
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If you are simulating some experimental test case, you should get the conditions from the test. In hypersonic flows, temperature can be important, if you are considering reacting flows. If you are solving inviscid case, no viscosity, no reactions, then it does not matter. Just choose something realistic, say
density = 1 mach = given to you Temperature = 300 K sound speed = use formula and above data velocity = mach * sound_speed pressure = equation of state |
|
September 28, 2007, 17:30 |
Re: How to model hypersonic flow
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, I have a set of free stream conditions for hypersonic flow. My question is when I increase the Mach number from one value to another, do I need to change the operating pressure and temperature? What other things I have to do? I tried changing the operating pressure and temperature and I did not get the shock wave.
|
|
October 3, 2007, 22:43 |
Re: How to model hypersonic flow
|
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
First of all, Mach number is a function of temperature (M=v/sqrt(gamma*R*T)), so when you change Mach number, temperature will change and temperature is a function of pressure (p=rho*R*T) as per the gas law, the pressure can be changed. If you have a set of free stream conditions, try running it first, if you want to change only the Mach number, keep the free Pressure and temperature constant and vary Mach number to see the change in flow field.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 06:21 |
Eul-Eul flow, k-e-kp-ep-Theta Turbulence model | us | FLUENT | 5 | April 5, 2011 03:29 |
Ho to model the flow in a Regenerator | alexandrepereira | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | August 25, 2010 18:35 |
Cavitation model with non-isothermal flow | pitisrisuk | CFX | 0 | July 14, 2009 15:30 |
TCL model for channel flow | Hui | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 26, 2008 00:28 |