CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

4-digit NACA airfoil: Trailing edge of the airfoil is not quite zero

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 10, 2014, 16:55
Default 4-digit NACA airfoil: Trailing edge of the airfoil is not quite zero
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Austrian abroad in Germany
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 12
sisi is on a distinguished road
Wikipedia says:

Quote:
Note that in this equation, at (x/c) = 1 (the trailing edge of the airfoil), the thickness is not quite zero. If a zero-thickness trailing edge is required, for example for computational work, one of the coefficients should be modified such that they sum to zero. Modifying the last coefficient (i.e. to −0.1036) will result in the smallest change to the overall shape of the airfoil.
Is that correct? I need a reputable source for that information...
sisi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 14, 2014, 17:06
Default
  #2
Member
 
Julian Langowski
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Bremen, Germany
Posts: 91
Rep Power: 15
Ruli is on a distinguished road
Dear Sisi,

book recommendation:
Abbot and Doenhoff - Theory of wing sections

There you find (almost) everything on NACA airfoils and also the formulas for contours.

Best regards
Julian
__________________
πάντα ῥεῖ - Heraclitus
Ruli is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 20, 2014, 06:07
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Austrian abroad in Germany
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 12
sisi is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your response. Just borrowed this book. Unfortunately it contains no information on "Modifying the last coefficient"...
sisi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 23, 2014, 10:02
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Troy Snyder
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 220
Rep Power: 19
tas38 is on a distinguished road
Rather than modify the coefficient of the equation used to generate the profile, you can linearly extrapolate the sharp trailing edge point.
tas38 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 24, 2014, 21:13
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 500
Rep Power: 19
Martin Hegedus is on a distinguished road
http://www.pdas.com/naca456.html
Martin Hegedus is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 1, 2014, 11:00
Default
  #6
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Austrian abroad in Germany
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 12
sisi is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your replies!

Quote:
Originally Posted by tas38 View Post
Rather than modify the coefficient of the equation used to generate the profile, you can linearly extrapolate the sharp trailing edge point.
So drawing a straight line from an appropriate point of the upper surface to the last point of the lower surface...? In fact, deleting some points of the upper surface ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Hegedus View Post
I checked this page but couldn't find the answer to my question....

http://www.pdas.com/naca456thick4.html

Quote:
Also note that the trailing edge thickness is NOT zero.
Anyway, I will try using different modified geometries to see which numerical results show good agreement with experimental data ...
sisi is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to set periodic boundary conditions Ganesh FLUENT 15 November 18, 2020 07:09
[DesignModeler] 3mm Trailing edge radius on closed airfoil henrikdahlberg ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 1 June 10, 2015 06:04
2D FFD Optimization RLangtry SU2 2 August 5, 2014 10:48
Leading edge and trailing edge of an airfoil rotor blade Jun_Milan CFX 0 July 11, 2014 00:07
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 12:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:33.