|
[Sponsors] |
September 23, 2007, 00:06 |
upwind schemes
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Are upwind schemes suited for flow without discontinuities? i.e. Purely subsonic or supersonic flow.
Shuo |
|
September 23, 2007, 05:26 |
Re: upwind schemes
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Shuo it's depend.
For Subsonic flow, you're talking about incompressible flow or compressible ? If you're considering only compressible flow, upwind schemes are suited! |
|
September 27, 2007, 07:50 |
Re: upwind schemes
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Upwind schemes are not the best for subsonic flows since they violate the physics of the flow itself! Of course, you can use them. What matters is the domain of dependence in the flow, not if it is compressible or incompressible, there's a clear difference between elliptic and hyperbolic problems.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2nd order upwind vs 2nd order upwind!!! | Far | Main CFD Forum | 7 | March 14, 2013 13:29 |
When to use upwind or central differencing schemes? | quarkz | Main CFD Forum | 6 | August 19, 2011 04:24 |
Second order upwind is not UPwind!!! | Far | CFX | 9 | May 31, 2011 09:21 |
First Order Upwind X High-Order Upwind (CUBISTA) Schemes | buscapeh | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 23, 2010 23:32 |
Upwind Schemes in Non-Newtonian Flows | ferreira | Main CFD Forum | 1 | March 24, 2008 08:54 |