|
[Sponsors] |
September 21, 2007, 05:50 |
Steady needs unsteady.
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The flow i am looking at has a fair bit of separation on a foil (3D) (around 15 % of the foil).
If solved with a steady solver, * k-eps, 2nd o on momentum: no convergence on the residuals, 'convergence' of the forces * SST, 2nd o on momentum: no convergence on the residuals, oscillation of the forces * k-eps, 1st o on momentum: convergence on residuals and forces. So far so good, it's was I expected. All forces results look similar. (average of oscillation for SST) Now if i switch to the unsteady solver, after around 20s the flow becomes steady: forces are constant, and flow characteristics are steady. Obviously my unsteady calc takes 'much' longer to compute, why do I need to run this case in unsteady to reach steady state? I have also tried to start from the 1st order case and to go 2nd order when converged without better success. Any comments are more than welcome. Regards, Nico |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unsteady DPM with steady solver | elobb | FLUENT | 4 | December 16, 2021 04:54 |
steady to unsteady | wlt_1985 | FLUENT | 6 | December 4, 2010 17:17 |
steady or unsteady DPM ??? | Marina | FLUENT | 5 | July 5, 2006 05:52 |
Turbulent: Steady or Unsteady: confusion | prem | FLUENT | 0 | March 30, 2006 11:40 |
steady or unsteady? (in dpm) | winnie | FLUENT | 1 | April 28, 2003 12:30 |