|
[Sponsors] |
Moving meshes: Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) formulation |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 29, 2014, 12:03 |
Moving meshes: Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) formulation
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Joachim
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 145
Rep Power: 15 |
Hey everyone!
I have a question regarding moving grid algorithms. Let's say I have a working NS code, and I want to implement the ALE formulation to run oscillating airfoils. Please correct me if I am wrong: 1. I modify the convective fluxes only, including the term -Vg*Q everywhere (Q is the state vector and Vg the normal grid velocity at the face). The normal convective flux at the face becomes Fc(moving) = Fc(static) - VgQ 2. I do not modify the boundary conditions. For example, at a solid wall, I have v = 0 and not v= vg. 3. The grid is non-deforming, and is only translating/rotating with a prescribed motion. Therefore the grid velocity is determined analytically. I recompute the location of the grid points, grid metrics, etc at each physical time step. Is that correct? I am having an issue when computing the fluxes at the walls. Using the continuity equation as an example, the normal convective flux for a moving grid is Fcm = rho*(Vn - Vg) (Vn is the contravariant velocity, not relative) At the wall, I have Vn = 0 in an inviscid case, so that Fcm = -rho*Vg --> This does not work... If I put Vn = Vg, so that Fcm = 0, then it gives the correct results... Is there something I have misunderstood? Thank you very much for your help! Joachim |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moving meshes | charlotte | Main CFD Forum | 5 | September 19, 2006 08:52 |
Moving meshes | Kraev Stanislaw | Main CFD Forum | 2 | April 11, 2003 14:09 |
Moving meshes, is that possible | Stanislav Kraev | Siemens | 0 | April 8, 2003 12:23 |
Restarting for problems with moving meshes | Maya | Siemens | 2 | October 4, 2002 04:51 |
Arbitrary Sliding Meshes | Anna | Siemens | 0 | September 1, 2002 07:02 |