|
[Sponsors] |
August 25, 2014, 13:35 |
Wall functions
|
#1 | |
New Member
Иван Сташко
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 13 |
In the thread "Near Wall Turbulence in CFX", ghorrocks writes:
Quote:
It is said that "wall lift-off in viscous units" which some software reports at the end of the solution, should match specific parameters; and if it does not, then it is said that the wall functions have been violated and the solution is incorrect. Is it correct to say that this parameter is only applicable to the k-epsilon model and not the k-omega model? Thank you. |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wall functions - questions about implementation | AlmostSurelyRob | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 44 | May 6, 2020 11:11 |
Boundary Field and Wall Functions, time 0 & time >0 | NJG | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | April 5, 2013 11:48 |
wall functions implementation | besh | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 0 | January 1, 2013 10:14 |
[ICEM] Export ICEM mesh to Gambit / Fluent | romekr | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | November 26, 2011 13:11 |
Wall Functions | pierre | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | October 1, 2005 14:13 |