|
[Sponsors] |
September 12, 2007, 19:04 |
Navier Stokes solver
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all,
I am currently writing a navier-stokes solver to implement slip flow in a 2d microchannel. I have only been exposed to MAC and SIMPLE formulations to link the pressure-velocity coupling with basic BC applications . As most of the microchannel simulations involve specifying a P_outlet/P_inlet ratio,inlet & outlet knudsen number etc I am in a fix because I just know how to apply a velocity BC on the inlet side and a fully developed condition on the outlet side. Please can someone share some material or share some light on the above issues which might help me in coding the above boundary conditions. Thanks and Regards Siddharth |
|
September 12, 2007, 19:38 |
Re: Navier Stokes solver
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If it is a 2d problem,why not use the vorticity streamfunction approach which will make it easier to not worry about velocity pressure coupling.
|
|
September 13, 2007, 02:06 |
Re: Navier Stokes solver
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I know about the vorticity stream function approach and can be used. But I want to stick to pressure velocity coupling as that thing has to be extended to a 3d model.Also the validation to be done uses the BC conditions I stated in my original post .So voriticty-streamfunction approach is a strict no-no. Also I have written my N-S solver which works well witth slip BC's and inlet velocity.I just want ti know how to incorporate inlet and outlet Knudsen numbers and inlet and outlet pressure in the code. TIA |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
thobois class engineTopoChangerMesh error | Peter_600 | OpenFOAM | 4 | August 2, 2014 10:52 |
Adding a term to Navier Stokes Equation | ashtonJ | CFX | 3 | January 15, 2011 07:32 |
How to switch off Navier Stokes solver | Sashi | FLUENT | 2 | January 30, 2009 07:16 |
Navier Stokes Solver | Khan | Main CFD Forum | 2 | December 12, 2006 10:41 |
Navier Stokes code | A.SHAH | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 5, 2006 04:23 |