|
[Sponsors] |
August 9, 2007, 08:49 |
What can't FloWorks do
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
A company I consult to want to start to bring CFD in house and have chosen to use FloWorks to do this as they are experienced users of Solidworks. I need to advise them as to the capability of FloWorks, what it can and can't do.
I have played with the software and read the blurb. However what are its limits, the sales blurb seems to claim that it can do anything ! I know that it only offers a k-e turbulence model, and that lagrangien particle modeling is on the limit of its capability. What else can't it do, or from what it can do, what doesn't it do well ? Thanks, Ruth |
|
August 11, 2007, 18:30 |
Re: What can't FloWorks do
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It can't mow your grass or take your dog out for a walk. ;-) Just kidding!!
Can you narrow down your question? To give you an idea, it can't do combustion modeling as far as I know, gas-liquid two-phase flow, and it's not well suited to complicated and intracate geometry due to the mesh elements it uses. But it can do non-Newtonian flows. I'd suggest getting some "white papers" and pdf documents on Floworks to know exactly what its capabilities are. Give me some time and I'll see what I can email you. |
|
August 13, 2007, 06:18 |
Re: What can't FloWorks do
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
When someone writes CFD that can mow the grass I'll be the first to buy it.
I have played with FloWorks, and read the white papers, but I find that it is wise to find out what the users think before reaching a concluision. FloWorks claims to be able to do alot, and I have been surprisingly impressed with what I have seen so far. However, one are that this company would like to model is particles which I understand FloWorks isn't so great at, and another are that might be of interest is micro fluidics. There is less interest in the ability to model combustion. I also have concerns about its meshing capability, I find that the 'partial' is never quite explained as to how models the geometry. Thanks in advance for any suggestions. Ruth |
|
August 16, 2007, 01:08 |
Re: What can't FloWorks do
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Particles? Hmmm. Are you talking solid particles in a gas or liquid stream or perhaps a spray ( liquid droplets in a gas )?
As far as "micro" fluidics goes, how small? When you get down to the millimeter, micrometer, and even nanometer level, you should consider surface tension forces ( for liquids ) and other often neglected atomic level forces. Where's that pesky physics book? ;-) It's been awhile. Overall, I'd say Fluent is probably your best bet. But I haven't used it first hand, so I can't say for sure. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Solving a NACA0010 in Floworks | magicroot | FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM | 1 | March 23, 2011 07:18 |
Cross Axial Rotation problems with FloWorks | jacobjb | FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM | 2 | March 8, 2010 15:20 |
Start with FloWorks | ironman | FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM | 1 | March 3, 2010 21:34 |
Physical correlation to FloWorks for air ducting | Matt Quinn | FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM | 2 | December 14, 2009 11:58 |
New dedicated forum for EFD and FloWorks users | Forum Administrator | Main CFD Forum | 6 | April 15, 2008 12:56 |