|
[Sponsors] |
July 8, 2007, 07:51 |
MacCormick
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In the MacCormick upwind scheme.
U^(n+1) = U^n - delta_t/delta_x*(f_(i+1) - f_i) is it f_(i+1) - f_i = A_(i+0.5)*(U_(i+1) - U_i) where A = df/dU or f = {rho*u, rho*u^2 + P...}^T |
|
July 9, 2007, 02:22 |
Re: MacCormick
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
it appears that the second order upwind schemes doesn't work for the shock tube problem.
Predictor: U^(n+1) = U^n - delta_t/delta_x*(f_(i+1)^n - f_i^n) Corrector: U^(n+2) = 0.5*(U^n + U^(n+1)) - delta_t/delta_x*(f_(i+1)^(n+1) - f_i^(n+1)) However the flux-splitting version does work. Is there anything i am doing wrong? Implicit: |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flux splitting MacCormick | Shuo | Main CFD Forum | 0 | July 12, 2007 21:47 |