CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

MacCormick

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 8, 2007, 07:51
Default MacCormick
  #1
Shuo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
In the MacCormick upwind scheme.

U^(n+1) = U^n - delta_t/delta_x*(f_(i+1) - f_i)

is it f_(i+1) - f_i = A_(i+0.5)*(U_(i+1) - U_i) where A = df/dU

or f = {rho*u, rho*u^2 + P...}^T

  Reply With Quote

Old   July 9, 2007, 02:22
Default Re: MacCormick
  #2
Shuo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
it appears that the second order upwind schemes doesn't work for the shock tube problem.

Predictor:

U^(n+1) = U^n - delta_t/delta_x*(f_(i+1)^n - f_i^n)

Corrector:

U^(n+2) = 0.5*(U^n + U^(n+1)) - delta_t/delta_x*(f_(i+1)^(n+1) - f_i^(n+1))

However the flux-splitting version does work. Is there anything i am doing wrong?

Implicit:

  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flux splitting MacCormick Shuo Main CFD Forum 0 July 12, 2007 21:47


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:31.