|
[Sponsors] |
June 30, 2007, 13:56 |
future of the CFD
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
as you know, cfd is being developed since 1970. this time, i want to know how the CFD is developed. as the computer performance is improved, it can be thought that DNS will be main issues. that is my thinking. I want to know other person's opinions. and what will be main issues?
|
|
June 30, 2007, 20:49 |
Re: future of the CFD
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I believe any regime won't be a main issue since an industry or academia doesn't focus on a regime.Rather than, many approximations will be reduced so that the simulation becomes close to a real case, not approximated. That is, the CFD will replace a real experiment which cost money and danger.
By the way, what is DNS? Do you know someone know that but someone don't know that. We, all in this community don't have common interest widely. In short, the CFD will replace the real experiment to reduce the danger and cost required in. |
|
July 3, 2007, 04:10 |
Re: future of the CFD
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
DNS is Direct Numerical Solution for the NS equations. At present none of the commercial codes are capable of doing this.
Well, DNS shall not be main issue in the future development. Industrial demand is for making commercial CFD more user/application friendly, and hence is the thrust of development. Adi Ansys India |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFD Salary | CFD | Main CFD Forum | 17 | January 3, 2017 18:09 |
CFD for fans & blower housings | David Carroll | Main CFD Forum | 8 | August 24, 2000 18:25 |
PC vs. Workstation | Tim Franke | Main CFD Forum | 5 | September 29, 1999 16:01 |
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 13, 1999 00:27 |
public CFD Code development | Heinz Wilkening | Main CFD Forum | 38 | March 5, 1999 12:44 |