|
[Sponsors] |
Experimental data validation and/or grid independence |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 27, 2014, 17:13 |
Experimental data validation and/or grid independence
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 16 |
Dear all,
I have a very fundamental question. I have some experimental data that I would like to validate my CFD results against. Should I test my CFD solution for grid independence? Or would an adequate comparison with the experimental data be sufficient enough to call the CFD solution (with a grid not tested for independence) a representation of what's happening within the system? In other words, should only a grid independent solution used for validation against experimental data? Or can a solution that provides adequate agreement with experimental data be deemed as final (without doing any grid independce studies)? I would appreciate your response. Thank you. |
|
May 27, 2014, 17:52 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,897
Rep Power: 73 |
First, you need to know how your data were elaborated especially if they were statistically averaged. Then, you have to chose among the CFD methods which can be the suitable for your comparison.
Grid independence is a valuable method but its application depends on the CFD methodology you are using |
|
May 29, 2014, 10:08 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
|
As Filippo said, make sure you are comparing apples with apples, not only in terms of data postprocessing but also in terms of geometry. Then, a mesh convergency analysis is usually the subsequent step.
|
|
June 5, 2014, 18:43 |
Re:
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 16 |
Thank you for your replies. I understand the part about comparing apples to apples but I am not clear about the answer. So to clarify, let us say I start with a computational grid, solve the problem using CFD, compare results with experimental data and get a match? Do I still have to proceed with a grid independence study on the CFD front or what I have is a sufficient solution?
|
|
June 6, 2014, 00:09 |
|
#5 |
Member
Thiagu
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: India
Posts: 60
Rep Power: 14 |
It depends on parameter your looking for, can you let us know the flow/measurement parameters
|
|
June 6, 2014, 04:24 |
|
#6 | |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,897
Rep Power: 73 |
Quote:
"solve the problem using CFD" means nothing ... you have a mathematical formulation for the flow problem that is solved numerically. But you have to solve the mathematical problem that solve the type of variable that can be congruently compared to your experimental data. Alternatively, (in principle as I don't know if your problem allows for that) you can use DNS that provide all point-wise and time dependent field. Then, you can extract all the variables you need for a congruent comparison to experiment. Grid independence study is a task that can be useful or not, depending on your formulation |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tecplot. add experimental data into a mesh | Alejandro | FLUENT | 0 | December 10, 2008 08:08 |
How to update polyPatchbs localPoints | liu | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | December 30, 2005 18:27 |
experimental data for droplet evaporation | suranga | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 14, 2005 10:53 |
CFD Validation Data | Alan Stewart | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 9, 1998 07:53 |
Multiphase experimental data | James McLaren | Main CFD Forum | 1 | September 14, 1998 07:35 |