|
[Sponsors] |
June 13, 2007, 03:06 |
VIV Modelling in FLUENT or CFX?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all,
As far as VIV is concerned, does nayone know whether FLUENT of CFX is a better tool in predicting VIV? Thanks. Sham. |
|
July 4, 2007, 05:55 |
Re: VIV Modelling in FLUENT or CFX?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Sham,
Also consider Star-CD from CD-adapco. Why, because they have clients in the offshore industry that use Star for this application. Another reason is price. We were recently visited by Fluent, and Fluent's salesen were very clear in there message. "We do not discount, you will pay our price." There was a difference between our budget and the verbal price from the Fluent robot. we asked Fluent for a written quote on their best offer three times and received absolutely nothing. No attempt was made by Fluent to negotiate on price. despite asking Fluent made no attempt to contact us. Regards |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mesh and Solve Times for CFX, Fluent, CD-adapco | Jade M | Main CFD Forum | 4 | August 28, 2012 03:54 |
High Resolution (CFX) vs 2nd Order Upwind (Fluent) | gravis | ANSYS | 3 | March 24, 2011 03:43 |
Wall function formulation in CFX and Fluent | gravis | ANSYS | 0 | May 4, 2010 12:03 |
Switching from Fluent to CFX | Terri Novotny | CFX | 1 | December 7, 2004 22:59 |
CFX vs STAR-CD and Fluent | William | CFX | 20 | October 29, 2001 14:55 |