|
[Sponsors] |
June 9, 2007, 03:33 |
problem in Phase Field method
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I used Phase Field method simulating a bubble movement. However, when I plot the streamlines, I found some of the streamlines across the interface, which means some fluid flows across the interface. However, I simulated the incompressible and immisible flow.
Does anyone can tell me the reason and how to solve it Thanks a lot |
|
June 9, 2007, 04:34 |
Re: problem in Phase Field method
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
maybe "parasitic current" is a reason,
this is problem of modeling capilarity two-phase flow with eulerian approaches, there are some treatement for VOF method, see this for a survay: http://scholar.google.com/scholar.bi...II&oi=citation |
|
June 9, 2007, 04:47 |
Re: problem in Phase Field method
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am not sure whether it is because of Phase Field method I used. For parasitic flow, when surface tension is weak, the effect should be negligible. I decreased the surface tension, there still is across flow.
|
|
June 9, 2007, 09:02 |
Re: problem in Phase Field method
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
- note that phase field is not essentially release from parasitic current.
- note that surface tension is not good measure, better is working with dimensionless numbers and change them, weber, frude ... and study effects. - also without surface tension we have some current too. |
|
June 9, 2007, 11:32 |
Re: problem in Phase Field method
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Concerning second, I increase We number by one order. It is almost the same.
Maybe I should try Level set method and check it. |
|
June 13, 2007, 04:09 |
Re: problem in Phase Field method
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Level set is good, but migration from phase-field to level set ! (so why u select phase-filed, level set was trivial choice at first)
anyhow, i think that false current should be smaller in phase-filed than VOF (because we don't have such discontinuty that is in VOF, also filtering of phase-field variable can be tested) and probably u can manage it with phase-filed, i don't knowe whose phase-field model u r used but, phase-field has several parameters that should be adjusted to give correct result, so u have good opportunity to do more with phase-field and then put it away, also it can be see as an original and interesting work. |
|
February 16, 2011, 13:20 |
|
#7 |
Member
|
Hi all,
I am thinking of using Phase-field modeling in my case, a Taylor bubble moving in a channel. As far as I know, OF did not support this phase field modelling. Can you please share your experience of which solver is most similar to that method as a starting point? Regards, Duong |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
a problem of incompressible two phases(water and gas) with VOF Method | zhangweisnoopy | Main CFD Forum | 9 | August 12, 2011 09:25 |
how 2 freeze 1 phase flow field & start lagrangian | KK | CFX | 5 | February 14, 2008 17:48 |
phase field or Cahn-Hilliard method | dusky.he | Main CFD Forum | 3 | February 2, 2006 17:43 |
Differences between VOF and phase field | 2L | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 4, 2004 14:30 |
pressure field problem. | michal | FLUENT | 1 | March 18, 2004 15:45 |