CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Body force (gravity term)

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 15, 2014, 11:27
Default Body force (gravity term)
  #1
New Member
 
iggy iggy
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
iggy_23 is on a distinguished road
Hello, I am working on a structured in-house code on natural convection flow, and I have a doubt regarding the body force (gravity term).
This term is generally encountered as -rho*g with rho density and g gravity acceleration, however most of the time I see it implemented as -(rho-rho_ref)*g with rho_ref is a reference density. Can anyone tell me why should rho_ref be necessary?

Thanks in advance.
iggy_23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 10, 2014, 05:04
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Rami Ben-Zvi
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 155
Rep Power: 17
Rami is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by iggy_23 View Post
Hello, I am working on a structured in-house code on natural convection flow, and I have a doubt regarding the body force (gravity term).
This term is generally encountered as -rho*g with rho density and g gravity acceleration, however most of the time I see it implemented as -(rho-rho_ref)*g with rho_ref is a reference density. Can anyone tell me why should rho_ref be necessary?

Thanks in advance.
Hi Iggy,

Hi Iggy,

The body force is indeed rho*g. Sometimes it is reasonable to assume the changes of the density due to temperature small (the Boussinesq approximation), so that the reference density is used as an approximation to the density for all terms except the body force that becomes rho_ref*g + rho_ref*beta*(T-T_ref)*g , where beta is the expansion coefficient and T_ref is the reference temperature for which the density is rho_ref.
Rami is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 13, 2014, 19:08
Default
  #3
New Member
 
iggy iggy
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
iggy_23 is on a distinguished road
Hi Rami,

Thank you very much for your answer. In case the Boussinesq approximation is not used, which means that in all the other terms the corresponding rho (function of temperature) is used, should the body force term stay as just rho(T)*g?

I think I'm missing one detail regarding the buoyancy effects. If we imagine a stationary warmer fluid region which is in the middle of colder fluid region, we expect
the warmer region to rise (if density reduces with temperature increase). So, what is the term which makes the warmer fluid rise? Both the warm and cold regions experience a rho*g term downwards, although the magnitude of this term is somewhat less for the warm fluid. Is it this mere difference which makes the warmer fluid rise?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rami View Post
Hi Iggy,

Hi Iggy,

The body force is indeed rho*g. Sometimes it is reasonable to assume the changes of the density due to temperature small (the Boussinesq approximation), so that the reference density is used as an approximation to the density for all terms except the body force that becomes rho_ref*g + rho_ref*beta*(T-T_ref)*g , where beta is the expansion coefficient and T_ref is the reference temperature for which the density is rho_ref.
iggy_23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
boussinesq approximation, density, gravity


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
coupling vof with single phase flow and gravity term alame005 Main CFD Forum 0 August 2, 2013 15:37
Gravity source term in PisoFoam DanM OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 May 24, 2013 12:30
Convergence Problem with body force driven flow Jinfeng FLUENT 1 December 9, 2009 04:54
DPM Body Force Sandilya Garimella FLUENT 1 April 8, 2008 04:30
Body force Jacob FLUENT 0 August 4, 2003 17:38


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:33.