|
[Sponsors] |
June 2, 2007, 04:09 |
Re: Immersed boundary method
|
#21 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
but about IB is "old" & "new",
i agree that concept IB is old, there are some about this in old books, if we look at old books on FDM we see somethig like interpolation based IB, e.g. Ritchmeyer's book or Zienkiewicz & Morgan's book (Finite Elements and Approximation) but is a new research area, maybe closed and re-opened recently |
|
June 2, 2007, 07:02 |
Re: Immersed boundary method
|
#22 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
rt : I use IBM in a very specific case, I'm not sure my work can help you. I work with High order Compact schemes combined with FFT for Poisson resolution. My research area is around DNS and LES flow at low Reynolds.
It's very singular, but if you are always interesting by my work, I can give you one paper and if you can read French I can give my PhD. Sincerely, |
|
June 2, 2007, 07:35 |
Re: Immersed boundary method
|
#23 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
u r right, ur research area is not interesting for me,
but as an expert people in IB, could you please give your idea (probably don't rely on num. experience) about my questions. also u solve poisson with FFT, i don't have experience with FFT but guess that it is cpu intensive, especially DNS enforce using fine grid, is it? and why FFT? how is computational cost? is your system stiff and classical iterative methods fail to converge? are sparse direct solvers better condidate than FFT (consider robustness and cost)? |
|
June 18, 2015, 10:29 |
Roughness in IBM
|
#24 |
New Member
Siamak Gharahjeh
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 14 |
Does anyone know if it is possible to include the effect of roughness on the solid walls by employing immersed boundary method?
As far as I know none of the methods mentioned below can do this. 1-Continous forcing method. 2-Discrete forcing method. 3-Ghost cell IBM. 4-Cut cell method. |
|
June 18, 2015, 10:54 |
Roughness in IBM
|
#25 |
New Member
Siamak Gharahjeh
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 14 |
Does anyone know if it is possible to include the effect of roughness on the solid walls by employing immersed boundary method?
As far as I know none of the methods mentioned below can do this. 1-Continous forcing method. 2-Discrete forcing method. 3-Ghost cell IBM. 4-Cut cell method. |
|
June 19, 2015, 08:24 |
|
#26 |
Senior Member
|
Roughness effects can only be included in wall function models, independently from the specific approach (IBM, body fitted, etc.). The underlying reasoning is that if you cannot resolve the wall details
you cannot resolve the wall at all. As a consequence, if your IBM can handle wall functions (not all of them can) it can also handle wall roughness (if you know how to include it in the wall function model). However, the Ghost cell method is actually one of several different approaches for the discrete forcing method. |
|
June 19, 2015, 11:35 |
|
#27 |
New Member
Siamak Gharahjeh
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 14 |
Thanks. I imagine IBM is more suitable to apply to low Reynolds flows where roughness effect is insignificant.
|
|
June 19, 2015, 18:30 |
|
#28 |
Senior Member
|
Well, there are a number of reasons for which the IBM is more suitable at low Re. However, high Re applications are possible as well. It is important to choose the most suitable IBM flavor for the given application.
For wall roughness you need a method which allows using wall functions. Thus, i would exclude continuous forcing, penalization approaches (with porous like terms) and VOF/level set methods. |
|
June 20, 2015, 03:10 |
Solid points coinciding the grids
|
#29 |
New Member
Siamak Gharahjeh
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 14 |
Thanks. I think it would be easy to implement wall function if the solid body coincides with the grid points completely. Otherwise, do you know any publication which may have tried a similar attempt?
|
|
June 20, 2015, 14:06 |
|
#30 |
Senior Member
|
Look for the works of Capizzano or De Tullio, i don't remember now the titles (just add IBM to their names).
The group working on the code NASCART-GT has also produced in this field. However, the idea is trivial. The wall normal velocity gradient computed by the wall function just has to substitute the one entering the the computation of the viscous term at walls. The specific details obviously depend from the method. |
|
June 12, 2017, 14:59 |
hi mr safar ,can i take your mail? i have some quiztion about immersed boundray
|
#31 | |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
|
||
June 21, 2017, 04:52 |
|
#32 | |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
this link doesnt open for me can you send me thats contain? i need ibm code tnnnxx |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wind turbine simulation | Saturn | CFX | 60 | July 17, 2024 06:45 |
implementation of the Immersed Boundary Method | mi_cfd | Main CFD Forum | 19 | April 24, 2019 02:24 |
Code for Immersed Boundary Method (ask for help) | syq129 | Main CFD Forum | 2 | November 23, 2010 04:16 |
Ghost Cell Immersed Boundary | mnabi | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 7, 2009 07:16 |
Immersed boundary method (IBM) vs Dynamic meshing | tomyangbath | Main CFD Forum | 5 | April 17, 2009 04:02 |