|
[Sponsors] |
September 29, 1999, 11:26 |
any better way to solve 3D stokes flow?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear friends,
Anybody can tell me what is a better way to solve 3D stokes flow for tetrahedron elements? I want the pressure and velocity solved seperately(better not to solve velocity directly) since mixed FEM formulation will involve a huge linear system. I am currently using a pressure-based, SIMPLE-like algorithm, but it seems not working. And is it WRONG to use linear element for both pressure and velocity since gradient of velocity is involved in integral stokes equations? I rememberd in T. Coupez's papers, P1+/P1 elements are used and bubble function is added for velocity. I am using pow law model for viscosity and inertia is neglected in momentum equation, so steady, incompressible stokes flow is assumed. I appreciate your response. bao |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how to solve steady flow in VOF model | raju | FLUENT | 4 | August 20, 2008 16:43 |
Stokes flow | Shuo | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 4, 2008 22:51 |
Bidomain Stokes flow | bluemoth | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | December 29, 2005 00:36 |
solve the compressible flow in microchannel? | sandernagoo | Main CFD Forum | 10 | July 29, 2002 10:22 |
Method for Stokes flow with continuous pressure gradients? | Matthew Cordery | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 31, 1998 18:58 |