|
[Sponsors] |
whether DEM or Eulerian approach for high solidup |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 19, 2007, 06:35 |
whether DEM or Eulerian approach for high solidup
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi everybody
i am having bit of confusion about the choosing correct approach for multhiphase with high dispersed phase holdup for example in case of gas fluidized bed with high solid up, whether we have choose Eulerian-discrete element method(DEM) or Eulerian-Eulerian two fluid method. in dense bed, particle -particle interaction will be dominant when compared to other force, should we use DEM based approach for dense bed? otherwise any criteria for high solid holdup for choosing DEM or two fluid approach one more question about high solid up is there any range for solid holdup for dense and medium bed.. or under what basis classified the dense bed with regards CFDUSERIN |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Erosion UDF in Eulerian approach | sravan451 | FLUENT | 0 | September 16, 2010 23:52 |
partice-wall collisions in 'Eulerian' approach | fluent_user | FLUENT | 0 | December 19, 2008 12:40 |
modeling atomization using the Eulerian approach | Hossam | FLUENT | 1 | October 4, 2008 07:48 |
whether DEM or Eulerian approach for high solidup | CFDUSERIN | CFX | 1 | April 19, 2007 10:18 |
lagrangian vs eulerian approach | leopoldo luongo | CFX | 1 | June 19, 2006 11:12 |