|
[Sponsors] |
March 26, 2014, 13:22 |
Stretched Grids
|
#1 |
New Member
Sai Prudhvi Nagireddy
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: India
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi everyone,
I had this doubt in the stretched grid topic. we have the two planes namely a) physical plane b) computational plane horizontal spacing is same in both the planes ie. x=episilon but the vertical spacing in physical plane is a variable, it increases. according to the j.d.andreson book n=ln(y+1) where n is the uniform vertical spacing in the computational plane when we solve the above equation we get del(y)=e^n * del(n) consider an example where the values for y are 1,3,6,10,15 with reference to these values of 'y' the values of n thus obtained doesn't satisfy the relation that del(n) is const. ie. the grid is equally spaced. can anyone explain me where im going wrong..! |
|
Tags |
adaptive mesh, stretched grid |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stretched Grids | Bhargav | Main CFD Forum | 5 | May 23, 2020 10:41 |
A question about dynamic overset grids | JXIA | Main CFD Forum | 4 | January 10, 2008 04:50 |
Advection & Stretched grids... again :o( | Frank | Main CFD Forum | 11 | April 8, 2007 22:30 |
Reloading grids in Pre | Pascale Fonteijn | CFX | 1 | July 7, 2003 14:33 |
UDF Face Fluxes & Partitioned Grids | Greg Perkins | FLUENT | 0 | April 6, 2001 02:50 |