|
[Sponsors] |
March 27, 2007, 04:26 |
spurious oscillations and upwind-scheme
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hello,
I wrote my NS-equation solver and am testing it. (unsteady, 3D, incompressible, cylindrical co-ordinate). While solving the Energy equation, i found oscillations after using Central-Difference (CD) and no oscillations if Upwind-Scheme (UD). So, for the sake of better accuracy, I composed a hybrid scheme after mixing the two (25% UD, as follows) and found oscillations but very little amplitude as compared with CD scheme. Below is the hybrid scheme: dT/dr = [dT/dr]_CD + ALPHA*(dx^2/2!)[d2T/dr2]_CD. Here, "|ALPHA| = 1" for full upwind, "|ALPHA| = 0" for full central-difference and "0 < |ALPHA| < 1" for hybrid schemes. I used "|ALPHA| = 0.25". To reduce the oscillation, one way is to increase |ALPHA|, say, to |ALPHA| = 0.5 and then do the computation. What I want to know is: Can I expect BETTER accuracy if I use another scheme, say, Lax-Friedrichs with MUSCL reconstruction?? I saw very good results for shock-waves in this case. In my case, for solution of the energy-equation, one wall is heated using a heater (20 kW/sq.m) and a water-jet is impinging normally on it. I don't know if this heated-wall boundary-condition is similar to a shock-like situation and whether the upwind-scheme is suitable for it. Based on your experience, please suggest me about this also. Thank you very much, regards, Chandra |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Calculation of the Governing Equations | Mihail | CFX | 7 | September 7, 2014 07:27 |
When to use upwind or central differencing schemes? | quarkz | Main CFD Forum | 6 | August 19, 2011 04:24 |
Definition of limiter function for central dirrerencing scheme | sebastian_vogl | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | January 5, 2009 12:08 |
SIMPLE and spurious oscillations | Max | Main CFD Forum | 1 | May 5, 2006 22:27 |
Spurious oscillations in porous media simulations | David Boger | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 1, 2001 16:48 |