|
[Sponsors] |
March 23, 2007, 03:22 |
CFD code for supersonic flows
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am working in the field of supersonic fluid dynamics. The main topics contain: 1. the supersonic nozzle design 2. supersonic flows simulation (The important parameters are pressure, velocity, density and so on.) 3. supersonic nozzle optimization
Can anybody give me the idea about which code can work well with these topics? |
|
March 23, 2007, 05:52 |
Re: CFD code for supersonic flows
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
StarCCM+
|
|
March 29, 2007, 16:44 |
Re: CFD code for supersonic flows
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Try Gasp from Aerosft. Note no O in soft! Came out of NASA/Vulcan heritage.
Question for A.S - what mach number have you pushed Star-CCC to? My experience with star predates CCM and going much past transonic in V3.X was not too easy. Currently using GASP and FLUENT. We push FLUENT upto about mach 3-4 . GASP we can go as high as 20, but it isn't alll that robust with subsonic flows. My2cents - Andy |
|
March 30, 2007, 07:22 |
Re: CFD code for supersonic flows
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Mach 20 Nozzle
|
|
April 2, 2007, 11:05 |
Re: CFD code for supersonic flows
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Compressible flow -> use CFX with coupled solver. Will give you an answer in no time. But for for flows beyond Mach 3-4 I would not use the major commercial codes. Use density based codes instead with proper shock handling. You might want to write your own Euler solver (with boundary layer displacement thickness correction). It's fast, cheap and may help you to design your particular nozzle fast. Do this only for relatively simple geometries.
Bart |
|
April 3, 2007, 14:37 |
Nice site
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello, Your site is great. Regards, Valintino Guxxi
|
|
April 5, 2007, 07:34 |
Re: Nice site
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Which site? CFD-online?
|
|
April 9, 2007, 12:45 |
Re: CFD code for supersonic flows
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
AS, Did your Mach20 Nozzle include any chemistry? Temperature dependent properties? What total temp/pressure did you have upstream of the nozzle? Is this a solution you could share?
We would be very interested to see a high end commercial code (as opposed to a NASA derivitive product) that can operate in that flow regime. Thanks - Andy R |
|
April 10, 2007, 16:19 |
Re: CFD code for supersonic flows
|
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Question: How to choose a time step? Answer: An optimal time step depends on the used mathematical model. General recommendations are as follows:
Solid Material: take the time step as one tenth of the body heating time: , where l is the characteristic size of the body, is the coefficient of thermal diffusivity. Laminar Fluid, k-e turbulence model, Weak Compressible Fluid, Combustion Model: take the time step as one tenth of the ratio of the characteristic length of the domain in the steramwise direction to the characteristic flow speed. Free Surface: the time step is determined by the condition that the Courant number equals 1. Full compressible: the time step must provide fast convergence of the pressure calculations. The initial step is specified similarly to Laminar Fluid, k-e turbulence model etc. If the pressure calculations diverge, decrease the time step. If conjugate heat transfer is concerned and a steady solution is sought, different time steps can be defined in the fluid and solid body in order to accelerate convergence to the solution. Select the Use Own Time Step and Step check boxes on the Enthalpy tab in the Method parameters window of the solid sub-region. Enter the CFL number or the global time step in the Step dialog box. Normally, the time step in solid body is higher than that in fluid. |
|
April 16, 2007, 11:56 |
CFD code for supersonic nozzle design
|
#10 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Can anybody send code for supersonic nozzle design using moc for M 3.5?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASME CFD Symposium - Call for Papers | Chris Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 25, 2001 11:17 |
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, 22-26 July 2001 | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 16 | October 2, 2000 10:15 |
Customer Services | Patrick Godon | Main CFD Forum | 32 | August 23, 1999 07:55 |
Since Last June | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 3 | July 12, 1999 10:38 |
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 13, 1999 00:27 |