|
[Sponsors] |
Negative propulsive efficiency of a moving airfoil |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 3, 2007, 07:09 |
Negative propulsive efficiency of a moving airfoil
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I'm doing my simulation on moving airfoil. I found that for some configuration, I got negative propulsive efficiency. Is that possible? Power input is defined as the energy required to move the airfoil. I've got a positive value. Power output is defined as Thrust * free flow velocity. In these cases, drag was mostly generated instead of thrust, hence resulting in the average Power output over 1 cycle negative. I also wonder if there's something wrong with my solver instead, ie such results are definitely wrong... Btw, I'm using a cambered airfoil. Previous test with naca0012 resulted in only postive efficiency. |
|
March 3, 2007, 13:05 |
Re: Negative propulsive efficiency of a moving air
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
are you using the relative velocty of your moving arifoil?
|
|
March 4, 2007, 07:59 |
Re: Negative propulsive efficiency of a moving air
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
what do you mean? The energy required to move the airfoil was given by P(in)=-lift force* dh/dt - Moment* d(theta)/dt
where dh/dt is the absolute up/down velocity of the airfoil. P(out)= thrust*absolute free flow velocity, which is 1 in this case thank you. |
|
March 6, 2007, 09:33 |
Re: Negative propulsive efficiency of a moving air
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The way the propulsive efficiency is defined, there is nothing fundamentally wrong with a negative value. It simply means you create negative thrust (or drag). If you think this shouldn't be the case, check on the motion you are assigning (is it backwards?) and compare the flow solution with your previous solution on the symmetric airfoil. Anyway, it's very possible to create negative thrust, and hence, negative propulsive efficiency, as any hummingbird can tell you.
|
|
March 7, 2007, 01:16 |
Re: Negative propulsive efficiency of a moving air
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks everybody. I found that I've made some mistakes in the motion, which resulted in drag being produced most of the times. In the correct motion, thrust is generated ;-). However, as what Mani says, it's definitely possible, based on the definition.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
channelFoam for a 3D pipe | AlmostSurelyRob | OpenFOAM | 3 | June 24, 2011 14:06 |
[blockMesh] BlockMesh FOAM warning | gaottino | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 7 | July 19, 2010 15:11 |
Airfoil simulation using moving wall | Alejandro | Fidelity CFD | 9 | November 4, 2008 03:00 |
[blockMesh] Axisymmetrical mesh | Rasmus Gjesing (Gjesing) | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 10 | April 2, 2007 15:00 |
Simulating an airfoil using a moving boundary | Alejandro | CFX | 4 | January 27, 2007 13:03 |