|
[Sponsors] |
February 28, 2007, 15:43 |
Best code for Cd calculations?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, I´m dealing with 2d airfoils with and without flaps and slats. Fluent doesn´t give me good results regarding the drag coeff, so I would like to know about your experiences about that, and wich code is the best to get that number.
Thanks! |
|
March 1, 2007, 20:47 |
Re: Best code for Cd calculations?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
The drag computation relies on many aspects. The computed properties of your boundary layers will have such an impact on your results that I do not think changing software will really be a solution. Try other meshes (with points enough in the BL, and a correct first grid cell size in the wall-normal direction), and other turbulence models. Anyway, for complex flows such as airfoils with high-lift devices, I have seen some papers for which the drag value on each element (for example on a 3 elements airfoil) was quite wrong, but with error compensation the overall drag value was quite ok ... Scaring. Regards |
|
March 1, 2007, 20:52 |
Re: Best code for Cd calculations?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi buch, Yes, I tried all what you said (all kind of meshes, different turb models, etc) Right now I´m using Fluent, and I heard that others codes use differents approaches to calculate the Cd with better results than Fluent.
I´ll keep trying! Thanks |
|
March 3, 2007, 10:21 |
Re: Best code for Cd calculations?
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Have you tried MSES?
|
|
March 3, 2007, 23:34 |
Re: Best code for Cd calculations?
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Nope, I didn´t. Do you know if they have a demo or something like that?
|
|
March 4, 2007, 02:24 |
Re: Best code for Cd calculations?
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I don't know. You will have to ask Analytical Methods (http://www.am-inc.com/MSES.shtml) What I do know is that the code is not cheap (US$ 10 000?) , but it is a dedicated method for designing and analysing multi-element 2D sections, even with some transonic flow. As such it is mighty quick, and, from what I've seen, very accurate. Importantly, it uses the same laminar/turbulent transition method as used in XFoil.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The FOAM Documentation Project - SHUT-DOWN | holger_marschall | OpenFOAM | 242 | March 7, 2013 13:30 |
Debugging Unsteady 2-D Panel Method Code: Wake Modeling | RajeshAero | Main CFD Forum | 5 | November 10, 2011 06:48 |
Open Source Vs Commercial Software | MechE | OpenFOAM | 28 | May 16, 2011 12:02 |
Small 3-D code | Zdravko Stojanovic | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 19, 2010 11:11 |
Understanding k-omega SST model source code | tmhonka | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 1 | September 8, 2009 08:33 |