|
[Sponsors] |
February 7, 2007, 21:28 |
Why do we find the approximate solution?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have a silly question-
Why do we find out the approximate solutions in various numerical methods , when we already have the exact solution, with which we compare it in order to estimate the error? Another question is- What are 'a priori' and 'a posteriori' error? whats the difference between them? I hope someone helps. Thanks in anticipation. Meena |
|
February 9, 2007, 11:04 |
Re: Why do we find the approximate solution?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have a silly answer:
For how many *real* problems of interest do exact solutions actually exist? Also, 'a priori' = before analysis is performed, 'a posteriori' = afterwards. Nearly every error estimate I've ever seen is a posteriori. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to get the solution of last time step? | lzgwhy | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 0 | September 15, 2010 23:23 |
Integration along a line during solution | DaRumpel | CFX | 16 | September 2, 2010 12:17 |
Does FOAM converge to exact solution in Laplace equation? | santiagomarquezd | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | March 26, 2010 08:52 |
Doubt on Implicit Methods | analyse In India | Main CFD Forum | 10 | March 9, 2007 04:01 |
Unsteady solution | Christophe | FLUENT | 0 | August 11, 2006 12:13 |