|
[Sponsors] |
January 14, 2007, 02:49 |
lift/drag coefficient and inertial
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
When trying to simulate a pure sinusodial pitching airfoil at high frequency of around 6Hz with amplitude of 30deg, I get cl of amplitude 1000+ and cd of 300+. I wonder if the inertial force has already been included in this value and must been subtracted to get the actual force produced.
I am confused because in some papers regarding wind tunnel experiment with a fruitfly, they mention subtracting the inertial force from the measured force. If so, how should the calculation be done. Lastly, does the gravity "g" play any part in this question? In my simulation, I did not include the "g" term and the NS eqn has been nondimensioned. Thanks! |
|
January 14, 2007, 08:57 |
Re: lift/drag coefficient and inertial
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
Im pretty sure that the inertial force has been accounted while obtaining the forces. Its true that higher force coefficients are observed for a flapping insect wing such as a bumble bee. I usually dont subtract the inertial forces. For example if u take the case of an implusively accelerated cylinder from rest, the forces that are generated during the initial times are inertial and can be obtained thru a closed form expression based on added mass coefficients. So if one subtracts these forces off, it might not make sense. If u add 'g', you will have different forces obviously. But thats a different case altoghether. -Dominic |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Inertial and viscous coefficient for porous media | franzdrs | Main CFD Forum | 6 | September 16, 2013 00:33 |
viscous resistance and inertial resistance for microfilter | zhhjll | FLUENT | 1 | July 14, 2011 09:55 |
Porous Media Inertial and Resistance | giogio | FLUENT | 3 | June 21, 2011 19:09 |
viscous and internal resistance coefficient in porous media | bansal_vikas1 | FLUENT | 12 | October 6, 2010 09:28 |
tube bank inertial resistance coefficients | Brian | FLUENT | 0 | September 8, 2004 10:04 |